New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (7078 previous messages)

rshow55 - 05:06pm Dec 27, 2002 EST (# 7079 of 7088) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

If you read history - and go a while back - it seems like everybody is delusional - but yet cocksure -- about everything. In politics - science - religion - every sphere of life.

If only the Bush administration (and the NK's, and other folks) remembered the human condition - and had some doubt about their positions - and willingness to check them - - we'd all be a lot safer.

When people don't trust each other - the reaction is not to communicate.

When the stakes are high - that's the opposite of the right answer. When people distrust each other, they need more contact - because they need more feedback, to avoid misunderstanding, to catch each other in mistakes, and for other checking.

And with the checking, and conversation - reasonable trust grows. Or at the least, the disagreements become well enough defined to be more clear.

We ought to talk to the North Koreans. We can agree, first of all, that we don't like each other. But then we should keep talking!

rshow55 - 05:10pm Dec 27, 2002 EST (# 7080 of 7088) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

If ever there was a country that ought to be reasonably deterrable (assuming even minimum sanity) - - it ought to be N. Korea.

The crazier they are, the more sense it makes to talk them into more sane positions. They've had a rough time - and they've shown a good deal of willingness to compromise, from time to time.

lunarchick - 07:34pm Dec 27, 2002 EST (# 7081 of 7088)

rough time

lunarchick - 07:38pm Dec 27, 2002 EST (# 7082 of 7088)

.

lunarchick - 07:40pm Dec 27, 2002 EST (# 7083 of 7088)

New Year's Resolution:

    POW WOW

lunarchick - 07:56pm Dec 27, 2002 EST (# 7084 of 7088)

A diplomat is a man who says you have an open mind, instead of telling you that you have a hole in the head. -- Unknown

A diplomat is a person who can tell you to go to hell in such a way that you actually look forward to the trip. -- Caskie Stinnett

lunarchick - 08:02pm Dec 27, 2002 EST (# 7085 of 7088)

Petrol in Australia reache$ all-time-high price.

lunarchick - 08:04pm Dec 27, 2002 EST (# 7086 of 7088)

A leader is someone who steps back from the entire system and tries to build a more collaborative, more innovative system that will work over the long term. -- Robert Reich

A leader or a man of action in a crisis almost always acts subconsciously and then thinks of the reasons for his action. -- Jawaharlal Nehru

More Messages Recent Messages (2 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us