New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (7055 previous messages)

rshow55 - 04:52pm Dec 26, 2002 EST (# 7056 of 7058) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Yes, and changed how - under what circumstances - and by what means?

For example - I think a lot of things that have happened in the Southern Baptist Convention are ugly. On the basis of clear assumptions. According to the ideas of "disciplined beauty" - these doings may be beautiful in some ways, according to some assumptions yet ugly in terms of other assumptions. Aesthetic judgements are personal - though a lot of people agree on them - and it seems to me that making the reasons for aesthetic judgements clear can be interesting.

I like the idea of examining the doings in the Southern Baptist convention - - some doings by "Mayberry Machiavellis" - - as an example of the kinds of discussions one could have about Islamic religious doings, as well - - a blow by blow history of Southern Baptist teachings, in the last thirty years - might be a very interesting analogy to a blow-by-blow analysis of changes in Islamic teachings and practices since 1900.

There have been some.

rshow55 - 04:59pm Dec 26, 2002 EST (# 7057 of 7058) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

A blow by blow discussion of the doctrine and rationale of missile defense would be interesting, too.

Frances Fitzgerald, a Pulitzer winner, could set out a lot of that well, much written up in her Way Out There in the Blue (Simon and Schuster) .

Applying the standards Americans apply to themselves to the Islamic world might be a very interesting alternative to military options. There are people around to do the work - it would take money - but a lot less than DOD wastes.

It might be a great investment in peace, and in Secular Redemption http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b085/391 .

There are uses of internet resources that haven't been enough considered by leaders. Some discussed before on this thread. Some others are fairly simple. Approaches that might be useful to Saddam - as a responsible leader - or Kim as a responsible leader - or Bush as a responsible leader - or other leaders, too.

We need to get some things sorted out. Wars offer ways to do some things - but not everything we need to do. And there are other alternatives.

More Messages Recent Messages (1 following message)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us