New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(7055 previous messages)
rshow55
- 04:52pm Dec 26, 2002 EST (#
7056 of 7058)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
Yes, and changed how - under what circumstances - and by
what means?
For example - I think a lot of things that have happened in
the Southern Baptist Convention are ugly. On the basis
of clear assumptions. According to the ideas of "disciplined
beauty" - these doings may be beautiful in some ways,
according to some assumptions yet ugly in terms of
other assumptions. Aesthetic judgements are personal - though
a lot of people agree on them - and it seems to me that making
the reasons for aesthetic judgements clear can be interesting.
I like the idea of examining the doings in the Southern
Baptist convention - - some doings by "Mayberry Machiavellis"
- - as an example of the kinds of discussions one could have
about Islamic religious doings, as well - - a blow by blow
history of Southern Baptist teachings, in the last thirty
years - might be a very interesting analogy to a blow-by-blow
analysis of changes in Islamic teachings and practices since
1900.
There have been some.
rshow55
- 04:59pm Dec 26, 2002 EST (#
7057 of 7058)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
A blow by blow discussion of the doctrine and rationale of
missile defense would be interesting, too.
Frances Fitzgerald, a Pulitzer winner, could set out a lot
of that well, much written up in her Way Out There in the
Blue (Simon and Schuster) .
Applying the standards Americans apply to themselves to the
Islamic world might be a very interesting alternative to
military options. There are people around to do the work - it
would take money - but a lot less than DOD wastes.
It might be a great investment in peace, and in
Secular Redemption http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b085/391
.
There are uses of internet resources that haven't been
enough considered by leaders. Some discussed before on this
thread. Some others are fairly simple. Approaches that might
be useful to Saddam - as a responsible leader - or Kim as a
responsible leader - or Bush as a responsible leader - or
other leaders, too.
We need to get some things sorted out. Wars offer ways to
do some things - but not everything we need to do. And there
are other alternatives.
(1 following message)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|