New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (7019 previous messages)

lunarchick - 10:55am Dec 25, 2002 EST (# 7020 of 7037)

Diffusion

Ink on blotting paper
or
ink in a glass of water ... diffuses

So do ideas

That so much of the cultures of the world are common within time periods is acknowledgment to this.

Sometimes 'war' is diffused

Othertimes 'peace'

So the question for 2003 is how to diffuse peace across the globe.

What are the common factors that enable peace?

These will relate to good leadership, a common expectation, the availability of the means to existence, a blueprint of National Law, and the continual education - and revision of - to grow people's understanding.

Everyone needs their niche with opportunities for an improved future ... and folks in general are optimistic.

lunarchick - 10:58am Dec 25, 2002 EST (# 7021 of 7037)

http://skepdic.com/refuge/bunk19.html

lunarchick - 11:19am Dec 25, 2002 EST (# 7022 of 7037)

Don't speak for others

Let them speak for themselves

allows a 'voice' for those wanting to take their place in the world

So if we 'listen' to the 'voice' of the general population in Iraq, Iran, and North Korea .... what are they saying - what do we hear?

lunarchick - 11:30am Dec 25, 2002 EST (# 7023 of 7037)

http://www.darwinday.org/

robkettenburg01 - 12:08pm Dec 25, 2002 EST (# 7024 of 7037)

Play "Find the Boeing Jumbo Jet!"

Muslims Suspend Laws of Physics!

The Matrix Document

The truth the media is forbidden to tell you

The Congressional Record of Testimony for the Oklahoma City Federal Building Bombing Damage Analysis

RobKettenburg

mazza9 - 03:41pm Dec 25, 2002 EST (# 7025 of 7037)
"Quae cum ita sunt" Caesar's Gallic Commentaries

Robert:

What a foolish "thought question!" On a recent CSPAN program a professor of international relations spoke of the history of Korea and how it 500+ years of cultural underpinnings support the bellicose statements of North Korea. You refer to movies, how about "The Godfather?" Are they making you an offer you can't refuse? The mechanism alluded to in that phrase was, of course, terrorism. Or as I suggested previously from the movie, History of the World" "Hump or Die!" Notice, the similarity with the "Mother of All Battles" statments by our other resident dictator, Saddam!

Shall we withdraw our troops? Why not give them Alaska as well as the oil therein as appeasement? How about Australia, Haiwaii and California. These states are Pacific bound and proper tribute to the thugs of Pyongyang? Why stop there? Maybe they'd like a piece of Checkeslovakia and Poland and well, maybe you get the point?

Isn't it sad that on the day we should be celebrating the birth of the Prince of Peace we must contend with bellicose thugs.

manjumicha - 05:03pm Dec 25, 2002 EST (# 7026 of 7037)

mazza:

Prince of Peace was never born on December 25...rather it was a date conveniently chosen to coincide with the pagan festival that the "converted" Rome still held on to....the commericalism rampant during the modern christmas in US would have made the early christians puke with disgust.......just another sad example of your self-distorted reality.

More Messages Recent Messages (11 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us