New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (6918 previous messages)

rshow55 - 07:18am Dec 22, 2002 EST (# 6919 of 6923) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

For example, work of mine, originally discussed at length on a NYT Science Forum, and set out in http://www.mrshowalter.net/bhmath sets out a coherent set of arguments - made much better as the result of discussion and the back-and-forth of dialog between informed minds.

( http://www.mrshowalter.net/bhmath , a link that was removed by someone other than me, and then reinstated, is only partly tangential to this thread - it was and is involved in efforts to accomplish one of the jobs I was given by the government in the early 1970's - and strongly encouraged to do by Casey. This thread is a big part of my effort to accomplish other parts - involved with issues of international stability and negotiation. )

There are "stumps" and inflexibilities in our systems - we're at a time "when the foundations are shaking" http://www.mrshowalter.net/sermon.html - - but some of the inflexibilities are softening - and some problems that matter a lot, in a lot of ways, seem like they may be getting solved.

lunarchick - 07:23am Dec 22, 2002 EST (# 6920 of 6923)

Afghanistan - women are being shown too little respect AGAIN ... after all it's the very same culture that fostered the Taliban .... the way to give women respect is to put access to women's bank loans their way!

AlQ's mob are said to be developing a 'dirty nuke bomb' on the borders of Afghanistan and Pakistan .... now that's a worry ...

lunarchick - 07:30am Dec 22, 2002 EST (# 6921 of 6923)

Good to know that your 'paper' was reinstated on your own web site ... which country did you say you lived in?!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Interesting discussions happening in Europe wrt the American powers over people's communication links.

In Europe - people have the right to demand that 'false information' about them is corrected - but not in the USA. That's why Europe debates some of the terroism measures closely.

In the USA apparently people who the authorities wanted to interview - for a range of reasons not all bad - after 9/11 ... seemed to have been picked up and put on a blacklist ... causing them (guilty of nothing) much trouble when trying to function in the now!

lunarchick - 07:34am Dec 22, 2002 EST (# 6922 of 6923)

Johnson said he was on the lookout for a secretary ... quills at the ready!

lunarchick - 07:39am Dec 22, 2002 EST (# 6923 of 6923)

Iraq ... leaflets are falling on their heads ...

Wonder if there's any information of value in them.

Were there benchmarking of leadership - then - the leaflet ephemera could checklist the current shortfalls ... what is/isn't in the national-interest?

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense


Enter your response, then click the POST MY MESSAGE button below.
See the
quick-edit help for more information.






Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us