New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (6914 previous messages)

rshow55 - 08:40pm Dec 21, 2002 EST (# 6915 of 6916) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

I wonder how our "missile defenses" will do against missiles from unknown sources? If we're dealing with stealth delivery - why use a missile at all?

(If we're dealing with missiles adapted with competent countermeasures nothing in the MD record indicates that we can stop them anyway.)

Still, I don't feel like fighting right now.

I thought lunarchick 12/21/02 4:34pm and lunarchick 12/21/02 4:43pm raised great points, and the question

"What are the conditions for successful social change, and improved deal, a fairer sharing of a national pie!?"

is a great question. I'd add this question:

"What does it take to get a larger national pie, from output independent of oil production? Output that is sustainable?

After all, the whole Islamic world, these days, even including oil, has a GDP not much larger than that of Spain. Subtract the oil, and you have only enough to support squalor. And the oil money comes to a few individuals or governments - leaving most of the population as supplicants.

rshow55 - 08:41pm Dec 21, 2002 EST (# 6916 of 6916) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

There might be more high-flown things to say - but if I were Bush, and wanted to find the right message for Arabic youth, a key thing I'd do is ask Condoleezza Rice to get briefed by Nate Rosenberg, or one or his distinguished students, or somebody else well connected with his argument and scholarship. Rosenberg and Birdzell wrote HOW THE WEST GREW RICH: The Economic Transformation of the Industrial World

Here is the first sentence of the Conclusion section from that book's Introduction:

"Our general conclusion is that the underlying source of the West's ability . . ( to advance ) . . were the wide diffusion of authority and the resources necessary to experiment; an absence of more than rudimentary political and religious restrictions on experiment; and inctives that combined ample rewards for success, defined as the widespread economic use of the results of experiment, with a risk of severe penalties for failing to experiment."

The Arab world faces different circumstances, and in some ways things should be easier - because economically useful knowledge and the means to communicate knowledge are so far advanced. There may be some new opportunities, and other approaches. Big ones. Even so, the political and religious restrictions on experiment and diversity in the Arab world are extreme - performance so far, outside of oil, has been dismal - and if Western experience is any guide, the political and religious restrictions in place essentially rule out the main sources of Western economic growth.

That message needs to be communicated in a way that works - as a fact - as a piece of checkable information.

One need not ask the Arab world to turn away from its faith.

But one can ask how they are going to adjust themselves so that their faith and their political insititutions permit them to function competitively in the modern world.

What a wonderful thing it must be to have Bush's power ! If he had a magic message that really would make things much better if it was heard - he could make it heard, if it was at all palatable. This message will be hard to put across - but it is an essential one.

Lchick , I'll be back to your question. I'm spending time on gisterme's points, too - but don't expect to post any more tonight.

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense


Enter your response, then click the POST MY MESSAGE button below.
See the
quick-edit help for more information.






Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us