New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (6892 previous messages)

kalter.rauch - 06:16am Dec 21, 2002 EST (# 6893 of 6899)
Earth vs <^> <^> <^>

gisterme 12/21/02 1:25am

I have no idea of the origin of Rshow's delusion that you may well be Condoleeza Rice or, for that matter, Lunarchick's paranoia that all who disagree with her may be her nemesis, the NYT arch-villain "George Johnson".

What's really sad is that Rshow, between his hints at dark conspirators deleting his precious monologues, and wheedling reminders that he's GOING TO THINK LONG AND HARD about your posts, is revealing himself as a chronic wino who delivers his diatribes from a dripping pay-terminal at the bus depot, whose LIFE'S WORK is stored on an antiquated Winchester Drive grinding itself to death beneath the cobwebbed clogged counter of the Greyhound ticket clerk......who HOPES you'll recognize HIS GENIUS after all, and hire him, and his crack-"horror" secretary, Lunarchick, onto your staff!!!

lunarchick - 07:46am Dec 21, 2002 EST (# 6894 of 6899)

Earth vs <^> <^> <^>

Johnson stop 'name dropping' yourself - really!

Earth vs MOI MOI MOI

lunarchick - 08:23am Dec 21, 2002 EST (# 6895 of 6899)

Winchester
http://moore.sac.on.ca/NORTHERNLYNX/northern%20lynx/hdrive.htm

lunarchick - 08:29am Dec 21, 2002 EST (# 6896 of 6899)

A catch-up read of the board posts (above) ran something like this :

space sewage to the
dark side of the moon

P'igloos

keep talking

little green men

eating baloney

keep talking

finding truth in the Garden
of Eden of Fiction

Keep talking

the missile will launch .....

Keep talking

Defense

keep talking

Hallucinations?

Keep spending

stratospherically expensive

Keep talking

up on the web (yet still in bed)

Dream on

lunarchick - 08:38am Dec 21, 2002 EST (# 6897 of 6899)

Anyone - a recap as to why certain zones are 'axis of evil' ....

Yet no criticism of those considered to be
'An Enemy of the People'
in ports of call ...
Venezuela, Swaziland, Zimbabwe ...

lunarchick - 09:50am Dec 21, 2002 EST (# 6898 of 6899)

EU Parliament

http://www.europarl.eu.int/home/default_en.htm

lunarchick - 10:02am Dec 21, 2002 EST (# 6899 of 6899)

Westminster

Members - HCommons http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/alms.htm

Members - HLords http://www.parliament.uk/directories/directories21.cfm

http://www.parliament.uk/index.cfm

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense


Enter your response, then click the POST MY MESSAGE button below.
See the
quick-edit help for more information.






Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us