New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (6686 previous messages)

lunarchick - 09:00pm Dec 15, 2002 EST (# 6687 of 6716)

Pakistan

90m people living outside countries of their birth
http://www.dawn.com/2002/12/15/nat20.htm

~~~~~~~~~~

Pakistan has to take steps to protect women!

A widowed mother of 7 children was stripped naked and humiliated for hours in Pakistan recently ... by the LANDlord and his ilk. She refused to vote for HIM in an election.

Why don't people have voting privacy?

If a LANDlord behaves in the manner above - then all his LAND should be removed and his victims compensated -- he certainly isn't fit to hold public office!

lunarchick - 09:06pm Dec 15, 2002 EST (# 6688 of 6716)

The Sexiest Man Alive

Would the people's choice be you, you or you?

Well actually, it's Ben AFFLECK!

Democrats looking for a new VP candidate - look no further ... you have 'Ben' .... and the great thing is, just like Bushy he's made moves on a Latino Woman .... what a potential replacement duo for the White House !

The vogue is for mini-me dolls ... as artists cum cultural icons BenJen may media savvy things to say ... !

lunarchick - 09:19pm Dec 15, 2002 EST (# 6689 of 6716)

MOON

http://www.guardian.co.uk/spacedocumentary/story/0,2763,860813,00.html

lunarchick - 09:23pm Dec 15, 2002 EST (# 6690 of 6716)

MOON

""... Nasa stopped reaching for the moon long ago. To be precise, it gave up the fight after Richard Nixon put a stranglehold on funding for space exploration, rightly judging that an America in recession and at war with Vietnam would scoff at lavishing money on astronauts bouncing about in micro-gravity and nibbling thousand-dollar space snacks. ...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/spacedocumentary/story/0,2763,860813,00.html

manjumicha - 09:38pm Dec 15, 2002 EST (# 6691 of 6716)

Btw, mazza, I actually read the link you provided to, supposedly, prove how inadequate NK naval capability is. And the site happen to start with the below quoted disclaimer:

"The North Korean Navy is the most secretive navy in the world. Determining the state of their fleet is exceptionally difficult. This list is built using the best publicly available information, although this information is sketchy, at best. Names, numbers, and bases are not known, and quantities in service are uncertain."

So is this the best support you can provide to discredit my previous postings?

More Messages Recent Messages (25 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us