New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (6162 previous messages)

rshow55 - 02:00pm Nov 22, 2002 EST (# 6163 of 6171) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

almarst2002 11/22/02 1:55pm - - there was some expansion above.

In particular cases - accounting can be pretty clear.

People always have to make some compromises in principle - that or pay some very high - usually prohibitive prices.

In real cases, the question "what does this cost me - and what are costs to others" can usually be asked - and can matter enough to answer.

rshow55 - 02:03pm Nov 22, 2002 EST (# 6164 of 6171) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

almarst2002 11/22/02 2:00pm - - - I don't have a one sentence - perfectly general answer that can apply to all cases in nuts and bolts detail.

But when circumstances are clearly set out - with agreement about facts, if not feelings - - people very often find ways to avoid really bad results.

People are not completely merciless (at least, very many are not) and aesthetic senses, and senses of equity - are shared enough that we ought to be able to get the incidence of death and agony from war down - and do some other things - - without people all becoming geniuses or angels.

bbbuck - 03:09pm Nov 22, 2002 EST (# 6165 of 6171)
"I know I have an expiration date. I just want it to be way in the future. Like a cheeto" - B

Facts are facts and missiles are missiles. If checking are facts and then checking our missiles and then accounting for these missile facts then the symmetrically checked dot facts should all be lined up and accounted for. Someone mentioned some missile defense facts that's good those facts should be posted and connected with other facts and symmetrical things.
Tomorrow : a movie review [In 2 parts]

lunarchick - 03:43pm Nov 22, 2002 EST (# 6166 of 6171)

A Clown's Code of Ethics

The Seven Clown Commandments

The 7th

He will appear in as many clown shows as he can


More Messages Recent Messages (5 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us