New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (6067 previous messages)

rshow55 - 07:10pm Nov 21, 2002 EST (# 6068 of 6083) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

rshow55 11/19/02 1:12pm

If you want a sense of how good the NYT Missile Defense thread is -- sample lchic's work ! - (search lchic, and lunarchick) - - . You'll find a wealth of thoughtful, wide-ranging citations.

I think she's the most valuable mind I've ever encountered.

Search lchic on other NYT threads and on the Guardian Talk threads, too. You'll be impressed.

Lunarchick and I are partners on the NYT Missile Defense thread - and she is much the better half !

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?224@@2cb4d7cb@.ee7a163/289

http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?224@168.2XHAaELrWy0^0@40679d@.f28e622/7418

wordspayy - 07:12pm Nov 21, 2002 EST (# 6069 of 6083)

Lunarchick,

I have watched you for 11 months now..You have done nothing for the discourse of this board. That is fine. Many an individual does not have an interest in NMD. I however do. I let you play because you are a plebe. I felt you would tire because you made no sense and others did not bother to counter you. Yet you still sit-squating if you will on this forum. It has been disclosed that you suffer from a mental illness and thus, the behavior you reflect. I just wanted to let you know that I have an interest in NMD and will no longer tolerate your constant SPAMMING on this forum YOU DO NOT OWN THIS WEBSITE- WE DO!!!!!!!!

rshow55 - 07:15pm Nov 21, 2002 EST (# 6070 of 6083) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

I think she's the most valuable mind I've ever encountered.

I've had the honor and pleasure of working with some very good people.

For inspiration - and quality of work - day after day - she's the best.

wordspayy - 07:16pm Nov 21, 2002 EST (# 6071 of 6083)

rshow aka lunarchick

you guys have provided this forum no valuable insight, no debate

This space is not provided for you to spam threads for other articles or to just throw up articles from other location. This space is provided so as to THINK AND WRITE YOUR OPINION without the need to SUCK ONTO the publications of others.

FOR THAT YOU BOTH FAIL...

YOU HAVE NO, ZERO, ABILITY TO DEFEND YOUR POSITIONS OVER THE LAST YEAR OTHER THEN THE COPYWRITE AND PEN-NAME OF OTHERS IN LINKS..

YOU HAVE NO ABILITY TO MAINTAIN YOUR OWN PERSPECTIVES..

lunarchick - 07:18pm Nov 21, 2002 EST (# 6072 of 6083)

wordsavvy - simpleton - Mate - George Johnstone

You've been paid by the Bush Administration
to 'watch' this board

Try 'READING'

Good Buddy!

wordspayy - 07:19pm Nov 21, 2002 EST (# 6073 of 6083)

IN SHORT YOU BOTH (OR ONE with a mental defect for TWO) HAVE DONE NOTHING TO MAINTAIN, DEFEND, SUPPORT OR REJECT NMD ON YOUR OWN... NOTHING... YOU HAVE WASTED EVERYBODYS TIME!!!!

lunarchick - 07:20pm Nov 21, 2002 EST (# 6074 of 6083)

Showalter Judd's in tantrum mode ....

no 'cause as i can see

unless ....

wow - now there is a thought!

More Messages Recent Messages (9 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us