New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (5445 previous messages)

rshow55 - 11:30am Nov 4, 2002 EST (# 5446 of 5447) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

I'm glad to see the boards back up!

I made these postings this morning.

Psychwarfare, Casablanca -- and terror #349-350 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@92.OeFEbzZGf44.38@.ee7a163/375 starts:

One could look at

Oct 30: 5380-81 rshow55 10/30/02 11:34am
Oct 31: 5409 rshow55 10/31/02 12:19pm
Nov 1: 5437 rshow55 11/1/02 8:40am
Nov 1: 5441 rshow55 11/1/02 12:23pm
Nov 1: 5442 lchic 11/1/02 2:06pm
and think that the MD forum might be being influential in the discourse about Iraq at the United Nations. I hope so - and think that, at the least, lchic and I have succeeded in setting out some arguments congruent with some useful discussions going on at the UN.

#349-350 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@92.OeFEbzZGf44.38@.ee7a163/375 continues to discuss gisterme's postings, quoting from the very first of them on May 2, 2001 - the first of more than 700 often very thoughtful and always authoritative postings.

It also includes this:

"The mid-term elections in the United States are important, and the way campaigns have been fought is important - there's been a deliberate, and at times astounding, avoidance of fundamentals. Over the years, progress in the "political technology" of the United States has reduced the level of discourse, and to some degree, degraded the American electorate.

. Bush 2000 Adviser Offered To Use Clout to Help Enron by Joe Stephens http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A22380-2002Feb16&notFound=true .

. In Virginia, Young Conservatives Learn How to Develop and Use Their Political Voices by Blaine Harden http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/11/politics/11CONS.html

There were other articles that bear looking at as we wait for the election, including

. Elder Bush in Big G.O.P. Cast Toiling for Top Equity Firm by LESLIE WAYNE http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/05/politics/05CARL.html

and many fine ones by Paul Krugman, #275 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@0@.ee7b085/313 .

I also posted this #1496 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b2bd/1662 in God is the Projection of Mans Unrealised Potential - Discuss

rshow55 - 11:31am Nov 4, 2002 EST (# 5447 of 5447) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

I was heartened when I read

. North Korea Says Nuclear Program Can Be Negotiated by PHILIP SHENON http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/03/international/asia/03KORE.html

The Bush administration is rejecting those offers, as it has many others - and in many ways, the administration stands, consistently, against communication patterns that can actually work for nations made up, as all nations are, of human beings.

. White House Rejects North Korean Offer for Talks by PHILIP SHENON http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/04/international/asia/04DIPL.html

The United States has limited power - and other nations are getting organized to the point where they may even solve some problems without the US. Although terrible things could easily happen, there is reason to hope that, with hard work, the horrors, risks and costs associated with the situations in Korea and Iraq can be gracefully and greatly reduced. Perhaps with the United States taking a leading part. But in some other cases, perhaps with the United States serving as a clear example of what reasonable conduct is not - what stances a peaceful world needs to learn to avoid - if communication and cooperation are to be achieved, rather than closed off.

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense


Enter your response, then click the POST MY MESSAGE button below.
See the
quick-edit help for more information.






Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us