New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (5395 previous messages)

rshow55 - 06:38am Oct 31, 2002 EST (# 5396 of 5406) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

5307 rshow55 10/27/02 11:59am
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b085/0

5308 rshow55 10/27/02 1:11pm
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b085/405
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b085/406

5358 rshow55 10/28/02 6:19pm
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/350
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/352
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/357
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/364
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/365
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b085/383

5364 rshow55 10/28/02 9:30pm
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/312
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/321
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/331
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/332
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/289
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/346

5365 rshow55 10/28/02 9:49pm
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/354
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/357
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/364

5380 rshow55 10/30/02 11:34am
Anything on Anything - 70 posts from c http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.eea14e1/1253 c to http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.eea14e1/1318 on negotiating tactics that could use the internet.

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7726f/719 to http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7726f/806

rshow55 - 07:26am Oct 31, 2002 EST (# 5397 of 5406) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

The links above have also been posted on the Guardian Talk thread - Psychwarfare, Casablanca . . . and terror .

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@173.Ur0Qb22UbbW.4@.ee7a163/374

I very much appreciate the openness and high journalistic standards of both the Guardian-Observer and The New York Times .

More Messages Recent Messages (9 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us