New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (5077 previous messages)

lchic - 04:55am Oct 20, 2002 EST (# 5078 of 5086)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

It's the 'Brian Wynne - Public Gut Feel' kicking in !

http://www.lancs.ac.uk/users/csec/staff/bw_first.html

lchic - 05:10am Oct 20, 2002 EST (# 5079 of 5086)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Indonesia

"" The greatest defence against militancy is the deep local tradition of moderation and tolerance. Islam in Indonesia, the world's largest Muslim country, is heavily influenced by Hinduism. Many see no conflict between a belief in sea goddesses and Islam - anathema to most Middle Eastern Muslims. The two main Islamic political parties, with a combined membership of 70 million, both believe in pluralist democracy and see Islam as a means to greater social justice, not a radical transformation of society.

.....

According to Indonesian intelligence officials, more than 300 Indonesians were trained in al-Qaeda's camps in Afghanistan. Some have joined movements such as Lashkar Jihad or Jemaa Islamiya, but many more have simply gone to ground, meeting occasionally in small groups, staying in touch with more senior men.

The local muscle for the Bali bombs included several of these people. They are looking for the man who recruited them: Hambali. In the huge South-East Asian cities, or among its islands and jungles, he is almost impossible to find.

http://www.observer.co.uk/worldview/story/0,11581,815610,00.html

[lchic | try posting a mug-shot on cable tv]

Then there's the quesion of how to get those
'rote-heads' full of rhetoric re-organ-ised.

China would poopa-scoopa them into re-training camps.

Is Indonesia going to let these guys run riot in their community
-- or --
widen their thinking?

And if their Army needs sorting - who'll do it?

lchic - 05:17am Oct 20, 2002 EST (# 5080 of 5086)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Iraq | Bye bye Mr Badman | 'It's a knock-out!'

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/story.jsp?story=344289

lchic - 05:19am Oct 20, 2002 EST (# 5081 of 5086)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/pacific_rim/

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/australasia/

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/

lchic - 09:19am Oct 20, 2002 EST (# 5082 of 5086)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Democracy

Public's right to know:

Before this century, if people wanted to know how their government was running, generally all they had to do was go down to the town hall or the agora and listen to the debates and discussions.

But today we deal with large, complex bureaucracies, statutes and regulations that often run hundreds of pages, and a legislative process that, even while accountable to the people, may still be too murky for most to understand what is happening.

In a democracy, government should, as much as possible, be transparent -- that is, its deliberations and decisions should be open to public scrutiny.

Clearly, not all government actions should be public, but the citizenry have a right to know how their tax dollars are spent, whether the administration of justice is efficient and effective, and whether their elected representatives are acting responsibly.

How this information is made available will vary from government to government, but no democratic government can operate in total secrecy.

http://usinfo.state.gov/products/pubs/democracy/

lchic - 09:21am Oct 20, 2002 EST (# 5083 of 5086)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

""no democratic government can operate in total secrecy

Showalter - did you get 'that letter' from the CIA yet?

More Messages Recent Messages (3 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us