New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (4927 previous messages)

lchic - 04:35am Oct 16, 2002 EST (# 4928 of 4936)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

That much Agency activity is unwritten may not be that much of a problem.

All the U's US sporn ORAL HISTORY departments ... there's tons of it!

These U's should move into getting sound bites on the inner workings of the Agency - how the CIA was run and operated ... 'last century' ...

The ORAL dots (with transcript) could then be organised to give an improved picture of the workings of 'inner gvt' and USA 'foreign policy' -- why don't those flush-with-cash foundations offer back-up for projects?

lchic - 04:37am Oct 16, 2002 EST (# 4929 of 4936)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

PHILOSOPHER MARTHA NUSSBAUM

argues for the necessity of "being able to use the senses to imagine, think and reason" - and to do these things in a "truly human" way, ...

http://www.tannerlectures.utah.edu/library.html
http://philrsss.anu.edu.au/tanner/
http://www.law.uchicago.edu/faculty/nussbaum/
http://www.oberlin.edu/newserv/01oct/Nussbaum.html

lchic - 05:07am Oct 16, 2002 EST (# 4930 of 4936)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

"" Ms. Nussbaum started talking. She is a powerful public speaker. Swift and confident in tracing the logic of an argument, she proved equally so in responding to questions. The vigor of her performance seemed intended to reach people at the back of the auditorium -- or, perhaps, to draw in someone lingering in the corridor outside.

From the front row, however, something else was conspicuous. While talking about the legal implications of ideas about shame -- or the relation of feminism to the liberal tradition in political theory, or her work among community activists in India -- Martha Nussbaum wore the very same expression she had while sitting through the introductory remarks: cool, reserved, eyes nearly shut. Her manner suggested enormous powers of concentration, as though the ideas presented in speech were being summoned from some inner workshop, where their assembly continues on a round-the-clock basis.

The unrelenting vigor and intensity that characterize Ms. Nussbaum's activity as a public intellectual are belied by her almost sculpted poise. The contrast raises an inescapable question: What makes Martha run?

Ms. Nussbaum may project an aura of grace at the lectern, but her effect on the public is anything but calming. Throughout the protracted culture wars in the humanities, she has given all parties an equal opportunity to experience the affect of outrage ....

http://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/nussbaum-chronicle.html

.... philosophy has not typically focused on getting loans, learning to read, and buying sewing machines

lchic - 06:33am Oct 16, 2002 EST (# 4931 of 4936)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Bali - LINKS

http://www.abc.net.au/
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/am/
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/pm/default.htm

Indonesian people are out 'marching' and very concerned ... a Brian Wynne Gut Feeling is rushing through their social structure ... (Bali-bombing)

One of the problems there is the block of seats allocated to their Military in the parliament - seat holders should have to step down from military positions into the civillian world.

It's said that an Indonesian AirForce guy 'made-up' the fatal bomb

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Back in the USA one fool with a low-tech-high-tech gun has the Capital stunned .... time to place the rego number in big letters & barcoded on top of all 'white vans' ...

lchic - 07:08am Oct 16, 2002 EST (# 4932 of 4936)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

USA did warn Johnno (PM Oz)

"We had no warning of a 'specific' attack' PM has said ... he now backsdown in Parliament/Canberra

AU | Alan Cobb Strategic Policy advisor :
Aus received info - didn't pass it on
(did pass on threats to 'energy')
Aus intelligence failure
ONA director general - didn't pass info on
http://www.ona.gov.au/

NYT - Java operative captured in June gave info

More Messages Recent Messages (4 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us