New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (4764 previous messages)

rshow55 - 08:40am Oct 9, 2002 EST (# 4765 of 4783) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Here's a repost of a part of a deleted post of mine: rshow55 - 01:06pm Oct 3, 2002 EST (# 4749

: I like this quote:

" The young are naturally romantic, and given to moral absolutes that necessarily make the real world of compromise, half-measures, and self-seeking appear corrupt.

.... Robert H. Bork, SLOUCHING TOWARDS GOMORRAH: Modern Liberalism and American Decline

We all live in a real world of compromise, half-measures, and an avoidance of too-harsh realities. People couldn't live any other way - and it ought to be no surprise when muddles and messes happen. Most times, moral indignation may not be very useful.

As for me, I'm taking time out for lunch, and I'll be back to you.

We've had some back-and-forth - - - "a few postings" - - on how to get some key things checked . . . . .

I came back about an hour later - and was cut off from the forums.

Shortly thereafter - all the forums were shut down.

I can't be sure of the reason. But I did appreciate the fact that the forums came back up - - and if, as I've imagined - there was some internal discussion about what posts to permit, and what to delete - - it seems to me that some honorable, public spirited real-world compromises were made. I was glad, when the forum was reopened, that these posts were the last left standing.

4739 rshow55 10/3/02 9:06am
4740 rshow55 10/3/02 9:14am

rshow55 - 08:48am Oct 9, 2002 EST (# 4766 of 4783) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

I do notice, however, that the Search capacity has been deleted. I think that's a shame.

If you click "rshow55" there's this:

"I've been working on this thread since September 25, 2000 rshow55 4/21/02 3:11pm where I had an all-day meeting on the web with an authoritative figure.

A recounting of what this Missile Defense thread has done since then is set out in Psychwarfare, Casablanca - - and terror from #151 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/159 on. Links before March 1, 2002 are no longer on the web, but are available on CD. Discussion of this thread continues from #265 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/281

bbbuck - 12:47pm Oct 9, 2002 EST (# 4767 of 4783)
I'll change my tagline when mazzone quits rocking.

They had to go back to a backup tape. You don't think they save this slop everyday do you? That backup tape(or hard drive) didn't have your stuff on it.

bbbuck - 12:49pm Oct 9, 2002 EST (# 4768 of 4783)
I'll change my tagline when mazzone quits rocking.

The search feature is up and available you blind clown.
It was offline when they were 'repacking', as they had to do after the 'mighty maintenance'.

mazza9 - 01:19pm Oct 9, 2002 EST (# 4769 of 4783)
"Quae cum ita sunt" Caesar's Gallic Commentaries

I believe that the "repack/mighty maintenance" was necessitated because the bull chip limit was exceeded!

bbbuck - 01:27pm Oct 9, 2002 EST (# 4770 of 4783)
I'll change my tagline when mazzone quits rocking.

I got the 'repacking' from kate_nyt, senior community producer. I've kept using it ever since.

Of course we all know they are really 'compressing' it.

As far as the limit, I don't know, I haven't gone to the bush forum to see what the post count is. But you've got to give them credit it must be at least 100 gig.

More Messages Recent Messages (13 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Cancel Subscriptions  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us