New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (4695 previous messages)

rshow55 - 09:56am Oct 1, 2002 EST (# 4696 of 4702) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Got distracted, slept late, and I'll be a while responding to 4653-4 manjumicha 9/29/02 8:05pm .

Easy reading makes hard writing. While I try to make some easy reading, some people might like to refer to a fine article Crude Weapons Cited As Achilles Heel in Missile Plan by William J. Broad http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/27/international/27MISS.html , which includes a wonderful mulitmedia connection: Warheads, Sailing, Weaving, and Bobbing.

I wish I could also post a picture that was printed in the Feb 11, 2001 WEEK IN REVIEW , that appeared on the same page as James Dao's wonderful essay, " Please Do Not Disturb us with Bombs." That picture shows a contrails from a failed ABM test - showing clear evidence of gross servoinstability. A kind of instability that only occurs with some approaches to control a lot more primative than those that would be required to cope with even moderately sophisticated ballistic missile threats.

lchic - 09:56am Oct 1, 2002 EST (# 4697 of 4702)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

FISK

322 children killed

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=338354


(won't mean much in the USA where the kids run round with guns and have killed each other daily for decades)

lchic - 10:01am Oct 1, 2002 EST (# 4698 of 4702)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Israel offers more criticism of Isreal than ... say ... the NYT

"" opposition leader, Yossi Sarid, branded the withdrawal "a capitulation by a blind government unable to see two steps ahead"

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=338353

lchic - 10:26am Oct 1, 2002 EST (# 4699 of 4702)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

"" ... Powell warned that the basis of those inspections may well change with the new resolution.

Hans Blix, one of the chief weapons inspectors, suggested as he walked into the meeting that he answered to the UN, not the US.

"A little later in the day I hope we'll be able to tell you a little more, but you must recall also that I'm reporting to the Security Council and that's going to take place on Thursday morning, and they are my masters."

http://abc.net.au/news/2002/10/item20021001061659_1.htm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/middle_east/2289338.stm

lchic - 10:52am Oct 1, 2002 EST (# 4700 of 4702)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

USA et al

.... a state has the right to ban someone from having children as a condition of probation? They will definitely have to consider executions ... Supreme court judges often thwart the intentions of their political patrons by turning out other than expected. Bush is likely to appoint people whose views will be so far off and up the wall that no mistake will be possible. http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,802243,00.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,802362,00.html

UK to buy 150 F35 Joint Strike Fighters http://www.guardian.co.uk/military/0,11816,670957,00.html

EU Carlyle head - cartoonist viewpoint http://politics.guardian.co.uk/conservatives/comment/0,9236,802281,00.html

More Messages Recent Messages (2 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us