New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (4664 previous messages)

lchic - 11:40pm Sep 29, 2002 EST (# 4665 of 4676)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

If Johnson is 'posting himself into a frazzel' must mean there's a lot worth reading on the board above .... or the CNN Iraq feature was excellent television!

http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/presents/

http://www.cnn.com/

kalter.rauch - 11:41pm Sep 29, 2002 EST (# 4666 of 4676)
Earth vs <^> <^> <^>

rshow55 9/29/02 12:00pm

Rice could be great...

Admit it......you and lchic are only saying that because she's black. You're both too politically correct to say otherwise.

I say that because she tutored GW in foreign policy, and you don't have any problem trashing Bush. They both have the same views, so race HAS to be the reason for your support.

bbbuck - 12:14am Sep 30, 2002 EST (# 4667 of 4676)
'How much do you make?'...'Well I'd half to look at the books, but I think around $100 week'....wife-'You don't make $100 a week'...husband-'They can't prove that, we don't keep books'..

Remember when people were nice? heehee

or How I Learned to catch badgers from the internet.

lchic - 12:53am Sep 30, 2002 EST (# 4668 of 4676)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

American Foreign Policy ( it is said ) changes every 24 hours .....

Ask an American what there Foreign Policy was 24 hours ago .... and they won't know

Above, a radio sound bite, would that be right? :)

lchic - 01:15am Sep 30, 2002 EST (# 4669 of 4676)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

"" Rice could be great... (Showalter)

Admit it......you and lchic are only saying that because she's black. You're both too politically correct to say otherwise.

    I say that because she tutored GW in foreign policy, and you don't have any problem trashing Bush. They both have the same views, so race HAS to be the reason for your support. (The Poster)
kalter.rauch 9/29/02 11:41pm

~~~~~~~~~

Johnson you're transfixed with the external image of women, thanks for the info on Rice - wow - didn't know that ... what does it mean ... etc

If you read our posts you'd note a need to move to a humanitarian world view (that's happening), and a greater understanding of human nature, the animal in man, the Laws and Rules of nature and successful culture ....

Sad that Rice was picked on by the Right-Right-Right wing ( was that the Nazi school?) and indoctrinated ... but she can and is moderating to overcome that ..

As above - a week, day, hour in politics is a long time ...

What do politicians really stand for ...

Why do they change and move their positions like fireflies dancing ....

Why do people move from one party to another ...

Why? Why? Why?

Showalter might say 'because socio-culture is complex and in constant flux' ...

There's a lot of GREEN GOODNESS required .... everyone can assist - and wow isn't RICE GREEN in the paddock! Sure it is! You bet ya!

lchic - 01:55am Sep 30, 2002 EST (# 4670 of 4676)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Here's a thought:

Political Parties are seen as being either progressive or conservative ... but there's a bit of each in all.

What would happen to America if Rice became a progressive .... if she took the millstone off the neck of the Conservative party ... opened up the hive ... exposed it for what it is ... held them by the left leg and shook all that GREED out of their pockets ...

Put a new philosophy into 'Right' leapfrogging 'Right' over left, so rather than it being right of left, it's left of left -- out there setting trends, seeking new directions ... back to former days of glory --- wasn't that memory from the nineteenth century why she joined ... along with a tantalising development package ....

More Messages Recent Messages (6 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us