New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (4561 previous messages)

lchic - 04:16pm Sep 26, 2002 EST (# 4562 of 4573)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

... but you do have a life's work that can and should improve the lives of others

... if only you lived in a true democracy

... with a literate CIA that could write you 'that letter' ...

... then you could Shine Shine Shine :)

lchic - 04:27pm Sep 26, 2002 EST (# 4563 of 4573)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

White paper - creativity, innovation http://www.meti.go.jp/english/report/data/gSM9909e.html

Product has a life cycle. New product becomes a source of revenue for government.

rshow55 - 04:32pm Sep 26, 2002 EST (# 4564 of 4573) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

lchic 9/26/02 9:56am -- the "reading wars" might be good exemplars for studying all wars - and showing the possibility of great and healing progress. Here are some references to reading instruction, and possibilities of improvement.

3969 rshow55 8/24/02 6:38pm ... 3970 rshow55 8/24/02 6:44pm
3971 rshow55 8/24/02 6:45pm

Can a rudimentary orthographic processor connected at first only to the phonological processor, and working only for the most common words, be trained first ?

Is it easy to do this?

Even if it is easy, is it worthwhile?

I'm arguing that it IS easy, and that it IS worthwhile. Both testable assumptions.

3923 rshow55 8/23/02 10:10am ... 3924 rshow55 8/23/02 10:16am
3925 rshow55 8/23/02 10:29am ... 3930 <rshow55 8/23/02 4:52pm
3931 rshow55 8/23/02 4:55pm ... 3932 <rshow55 8/23/02 5:00pm

3972-3975 rshow55 8/24/02 6:46pm

3992-3999 rshow55 8/26/02 7:44pm

4013-4014 rshow55 8/29/02 7:18pm

MD, physical laws, and politics: 4016 rshow55 8/29/02 9:01pm

More Messages Recent Messages (9 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us