New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (4429 previous messages)

rshow55 - 09:39pm Sep 19, 2002 EST (# 4430 of 4430) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

I have also been doing my duty.

MD4400 rshow55 9/19/02 8:56am

MD4403 rshow55 9/19/02 9:33am

A special kind of communication is sometimes needed - when there is doubt about what is right. That kind of communication is needed for "fighting out" questions of logic and fact. If the ideas aren't fought out - more bloody fights are sometimes unavoidable. To be merciful and responsible to human beings - sometimes you have to take a harsh, stark view of ideas that have consequences.

When consequences matter - getting logic and facts straight is vitally important - and though it has costs - if the basic requirements of communication set out in http://www.worldtrans.org/TP/TP1/TP1-17.HTML are satisfied - - it can be done.

We need to learn to do it better. This thread has partly been about that.

4365 rshow55 9/18/02 7:55am ... 4366 rshow55 9/18/02 10:26am
4367 rshow55 9/18/02 10:37am ... 4369 rshow55 9/18/02 11:11am ... 4370 rshow55 9/18/02 11:11am

Enough is going badly enough - things are out of balance enough -- there's enough crazy behavior - that people ought to seriously consider getting some key facts established - so that we'd know enough - about the past, and about ourselves - so that stable, peaceful relations might have a decent chance.

Is it possible that the Bush administration is setting up a war in order to win an election where, without the war , they'd have to talk about things like Enron ? People should check.

Laws of Power: MD4339 rshow55 9/16/02 9:16am

MD4350 rshow55 9/16/02 5:03pm

Links to CIA and my security problems, this thread:
3774-3779 rshow55 8/17/02 5:58pm

3843 rshow55 8/20/02 8:30pm . . . Pity Bill Casey died under such awkward circumstances - so very few days before he was to testify about Iran-Contra. There are things that need to be checked - - and things the whole world has in interest in getting checked.

Friedman is right that the respectable values of the United States are winning. We shouldn't besmirch those values. We're asking for better behavior from the Islamic culture - and owe them, and ourselves, honest behavior ourselves.

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense


Enter your response, then click the POST MY MESSAGE button below.
See the
quick-edit help for more information.






Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us