New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (4420 previous messages)

rshow55 - 02:09pm Sep 19, 2002 EST (# 4421 of 4427) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

There's a problem with human beings. If you tell them enough lies - - big enough lies - coherently enough - often enough -- very often they come to believe. The Nazis were masters of that, CIA learned everything they knew and worked to improve it - and things need to be checked - - including things where most Americans now trust their government completely - though they shouldn't.

There is a big reason why discussions of the US "missile defense" program needs to include discussion about the mind, and mindsets -and problems of communication.

That is that psychological warfare - - organized deception -- fraud, has been an essential part of US military-industrial arrangements for a long time - and was instrumental to the way the Cold War played out. But it has been a long time since - and patterns that may have been justified (if risky) before the fall of the Soviet Union are justified no longer.

MD152 rshow55 3/3/02 11:56am . . . "voters would have to understand patterns where there has been much effort, over half a century, to conceal and muddle some fundamentals.

Casablanca is common ground, something culturally literate Americans know -- and that people the whole world over understand, at the level of sympathy, and intellectually, too. I used the movie as a point of departure in PSYCHWAR, CASABLANCA, AND TERROR , which tells a key story about the Cold War, interesting to American, Russians, and others. http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/0 Especially the core story part, from posting 13 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/12 to posting 23 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/22 There is a comment in #26 that I feel some may find interesting, as well...

Movie - script - making it 'work' http://www.writersconference.com/crew/progmain.html

An illustrated script of Casablanca http://www.edict.com.hk/movies/casablanca/casablanca1.htm

A false and dangerous dream: rshow55 3/3/02 12:10pm

We need to explain what has happened - - nations all over the world have a stake in this - - and we have to find common ground, shared space, with people as they are -- including people who don't read the NYT:

Huntin' for Nascar-Lovin', Moon-Pie-Eatin', Bluegrass-Listenin', Shotgun-totin' Democrats By Matt Bai http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/15/magazine/15STRATET.html

The "missile defense" boondoggle could be expained, and explained clearly - to people who have the sophisication that it takes to appreciate NASCAR. I don't think these folks like to be misled, lied to, betrayed any more than anybody else. But they need to understand - - and for that - people need to take the trouble to find shared space with them. Right now, a lot of these folks trust the Bush administration completely - - - but lies are unstable - and these folks don't like people making fools of them. If they were on a jury, looking at what the "missile defense" programs can do, what the people supporting the programs have claimed, and what has been spent, they'd be angry . These folks know something about the value of money - and have good sense - once they start paying attention.

bbbuck - 02:13pm Sep 19, 2002 EST (# 4422 of 4427)
Good bye Hampton Stevens - - My tagline was erroneous.

And the beat goes on.

almarst2002 - 02:56pm Sep 19, 2002 EST (# 4423 of 4427)

Robert,

For better or worst, but I am not a "Putin stand-in".

I have no idea what is on his mind. I even don't follow his public statements.

Sorry if that may cause a dissapointment.

Alex Feldman.

almarst2002 - 02:58pm Sep 19, 2002 EST (# 4424 of 4427)

GERMAN MINISTER COMPARES BUSH TO HITLER - http://reuters.com/news_article.jhtml?type=politicsnews&StoryID=1471464

More Messages Recent Messages (3 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us