New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (4280 previous messages)

lchic - 09:21pm Sep 12, 2002 EST (# 4281 of 4290)

Key concepts for moving forward may include:

    Benchmarking - defining the present
    Incremental Change - moving on (carefully) - improving
    Alliances - working with others
    Longer Term Goals - having a sense of direction
    Vision - aiming to get 'somewhere' (a known visualised destination)

lchic - 05:21am Sep 13, 2002 EST (# 4282 of 4290)

Pan Handle

Smiling
with dimples
beguiling
a whiling
'The Fixer'
awaiting
studiously
contemplating
averting eyes
deliberating
how to swing
right

    right?
    right!
lchic2002

lchic - 05:45am Sep 13, 2002 EST (# 4283 of 4290)

"" He pointed his silver-tongued gun with some delicacy and a certain noblesse oblige, but there was no doubt he was holding it to ... http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,791294,00.html ... From Kyoto and Johannesburg, to the ICC, steel tariffs, NMD and nuclear testing, too much has happened (or not happened) since last year's speech to take this one at face value.

lchic - 07:07am Sep 13, 2002 EST (# 4284 of 4290)

JEB http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/story.jsp?story=332781

http://www.independent.co.uk/

GEORGE http://news.independent.co.uk/world/politics/story.jsp?story=332907

lchic - 07:14am Sep 13, 2002 EST (# 4285 of 4290)

"" Aronsfeld hated myths and romanticising, and challenged those in the Jewish community who built a golden glow around the "haim" – life in the Old Country in Eastern Europe – or who only saw Israel through rose-tinted glasses. With angry candour, he challenged the myths of Jewish life which tried to obscure the many flaws and prejudices evident in the course of Jewish history. His descriptions of Jesus and of Spinoza as "outsiders" were thought-provoking and based on solid research. http://news.independent.co.uk/people/obituaries/story.jsp?story=331150

lchic - 07:19am Sep 13, 2002 EST (# 4286 of 4290)

"If you can learn by watching somebody else's mistakes, that can make life easier for you.

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_medical/story.jsp?story=332469

lchic - 07:32am Sep 13, 2002 EST (# 4287 of 4290)

Miss Madeleine
http://abc.net.au/news/justin/nat/newsnat-13sep2002-102.htm

lchic - 07:43am Sep 13, 2002 EST (# 4288 of 4290)

RU space agency http://www.rosaviakosmos.ru/english/eindex.htm

http://abc.net.au/newsradio/

More Messages Recent Messages (2 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us