New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (4241 previous messages)

lchic - 10:32pm Sep 9, 2002 EST (# 4242 of 4250)

Standards (1) - Quality - testing

It seems the USA press largely ignored 'the other side' in the Middle East Israeli (v Others) war

Not putting both sides was a disgrace - shortchanging the intelligence of the American People who were fed skewed propaganda.

Now the Israeli camp are running USA foreign policy once more .... taking the USA kids into a WAR in the ME ... first into Iraq (a ten year stint) to oust the badman ... then the countries around .... supposedly to instate democracy.

How democratic is the Israeli/Palestine situation?

What 'standards' 'quality' and lifestyle can a Palestinian currently enjoy - 65%unemployment - genocide.

A trouble spot is the MIND of the Saudi Arabians - who were behind 9/11, behind suicide bombing in Palestine ... why not go in and sort out Saudi?

Seems that those who warn that the Middle East might 'blow-up' ... OUT OF CONTROL ... as the USA wills many countries into Chaos ... have a reason to think that way!

~~~~~~~~~~

lchic - 10:37pm Sep 9, 2002 EST (# 4243 of 4250)

Standards (2) - Quality - testing

All countries should enjoy 'civil' rule ... countries are composed of peoples with many different belief systems.

If all belief systems were set one against the other - to determine via weighting which were good and progressive, mediocre, poor and falling behind ... then as in the recent report on Arab states there are definate LAGs in that geographic area of North Africa and the Middle East.

Using women as an indicator - how do they fair?

Could the women of these zones be 'helped' to improve their status, education, job opportunities, career prospects ..... creatively how could this be achieved? What incentives could be offered.

Were the area to have ALL WOMEN LEADERS - be a starting point?!

lchic - 11:38pm Sep 9, 2002 EST (# 4244 of 4250)

Sycophantic - Blair

Mr Blair faced further criticism from his European allies yesterday when the French president, Jacques Chirac, hinted that he found the British prime minister's support for the US on Iraq "sycophantic".

Mr Chirac used an interview in the New York Times to state that he found the Bush administration doctrine of pre-emptive military action in its fight against terrorism "extraordinarily dangerous" and to stress that France would never act as a lackey for America.

"In life, you know, one must not confuse friends with sycophants... It's better to have only a few friends than to have a lot of sycophants. And I'm telling you that France considers itself one of the friends of the Americans, not necessarily one of its sycophants," he said.

He went on to emphasise that Mr Blair was isolating himself by aligning Britain so firmly with America.

"It's not Schröder and I on one side, and Bush and Blair on the other; it's Bush and Blair on one side and all the others on the other side," he said.

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/foreignaffairs/story/0,11538,789151,00.html

lchic - 11:54pm Sep 9, 2002 EST (# 4245 of 4250)

http://www.guardian.co.uk/elsewhere/

lchic - 05:54am Sep 10, 2002 EST (# 4246 of 4250)

American Media - napped - after the fall of the berlin wall ... so says David Halberstram .. they withdrew foreign correspondents and concentrated on domestic trivia. America had been 'out' in the world since the end of WWI ... on Sept11 the world came 'home'. (www.abc.net.au/7.30 Tues)


( THE MAKING OF A QUAGMIRE by David Halberstram (Ballantine Books, New York)

Are Ancient Protocols the True Force Driving the Shadow Government? http://www.888webtoday.com/diamond19.html

lchic - 05:57am Sep 10, 2002 EST (# 4247 of 4250)

see tues http://abc.net.au/7.30/

lchic - 06:00am Sep 10, 2002 EST (# 4248 of 4250)

http://www.888webtoday.com/

More Messages Recent Messages (2 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us