New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (4208 previous messages)

lchic - 05:42pm Sep 6, 2002 EST (# 4209 of 4229)

Reducing the human labour requirement in process has rightly been an aim, from factory production belt, to integrated Management Information Systems (MIS), reducing costs per widget/unit output.

For the First World this means 'spare labour' with 'underemployment'.

It's the task of Entities such as government to 'redeploy labour' into new areas and new lines of work.

Looking at Trends and into the Future - how should National/International Economies shape up?

What part if any would Nukes play in this?


widget http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/0,,sid9_gci213364,00.html

lchic - 08:33pm Sep 6, 2002 EST (# 4210 of 4229)

China restricts internet

"" A search for Jiang on Google turns up a Web page posted by the banned Falun Gong spiritual movement entitled "Exposing the crimes of Jiang Zemin." The group accuses Jiang of killing its followers in the course of a crackdown aimed at eliminating the group, viewed as a threat to communist control. http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/headline/tech/1560382

There's also a 'GAME' under Jiang that he's none too happy about!

lchic - 08:43pm Sep 6, 2002 EST (# 4211 of 4229)

Washington is said to funnel 80% of USA communications eMail-internet traffic!

James Bond Meets The 7 Layer OSI Model

http://www.pe.net/~rlewis/Resources/james.html http://cmt.tstc.edu/database/networking/basics/osi.html

lchic - 08:46pm Sep 6, 2002 EST (# 4212 of 4229)

Showalter - The $64,000 question is
can you get into the box -
NO!
sorry to hear that you can't use your eMail ...

How much money have Congress given 'the Shadow' to sit on and in everyone's private communication links ?!

You live in a very Orwellian Country !

lchic - 08:57pm Sep 6, 2002 EST (# 4213 of 4229)

Too much 'monkey business' :)

http://www.medicine.mcgill.ca/physio/vlabonline/caplab/biphasic.htm http://www.hhmi.org/research/investigators/maunsell.html

kalter.rauch - 02:22am Sep 7, 2002 EST (# 4214 of 4229)
Earth vs <^> <^> <^>

This isn't a forum on "Missile Defense". It's a propaganda monopoly.

lchic - 03:51am Sep 7, 2002 EST (# 4215 of 4229)

Refers not to a specific post - are you saying that the US government relies too much on propaganda rather than factual information, and that it has a monopoly over the 'lines' of communication in the information era?

lchic - 03:53am Sep 7, 2002 EST (# 4216 of 4229)

Big Brother

The government and its agencies, while keen to keep their own secrets, are less willing to allow us ours, handing themselves new powers that let them steadily map our private lives.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/bigbrother/privacy/yourlife/story/0,12384,785867,00.html

More Messages Recent Messages (13 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us