New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (4180 previous messages)

rshow55 - 06:55pm Sep 4, 2002 EST (# 4181 of 4187) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

For much of today, the 3d most e-mailed story was from yesterday - From Here to Infinity: Obsessing With the Magic of Primes by George Johnson http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/03/science/03ESSA.html

Studying primes, those mathematical quarks from which all numbers are made, is a game anyone can play, and become obsessed with.

4140 wrcooper 9/2/02 8:37pm reads as follows.

"This is George Johnson this time.

"You can examine me in light of Piaget all you want, but it's not going to change how I think, and it's not going to change the fact that your opinions represent a dangerous aberration that requires the strongest possible refutation.

"You will be checked and checked thoroughly.

"It is not for naught that we saw to it that you began posting here in the New York Times. This is a controlled venue. We know who you are and where you are.

"Don't call the CIA again. It won't do you any good. If you want to talk to us, just whisper into your pillow.

Looking at this from a Republican and national interest point of view exclusively - it seems to me that "Johnson's" position is bad policy and bad politics - to say no more. If wrcooper is Johnson, that can't be hidden if anybody cares much about getting at the truth. Especially for the TIMES. But others could get at the truth, as well. Some old investors of mine would be well justified in funding a lawsuit, for instance. Any number of journalists, with a little work and chutzpah, could get to the answer as well. So could any of many politicians.

rshow55 - 06:57pm Sep 4, 2002 EST (# 4182 of 4187) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

My relationship with George Johnson and his many pseudonymous characters, including Patrick Gunkel, goes back a long way - since before http://www.wisc.edu/rshowalt/klinerec

For a long time, I was hoping to have him as a partner - and there was reason to suspect some mutuality on the matter.

4146 rshowalt 9/3/02 7:41am

My respect for some aspects of Johnson's work is great - for instance I thought From Here to Infinity was a fine piece of standard journalism. Johnson's written some fine things - here is one I liked enough to put on the web http://www.wisc.edu/rshowalt/finearts from his book Machinery of the Mind .

I respect Johnson's achievements, but my admiration for both his work and his person has its limits.

More Messages Recent Messages (5 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us