New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (3918 previous messages)

lchic - 06:44am Aug 23, 2002 EST (# 3919 of 3932)

Look again at 'freedom' and 'democracy' in the USA

Lchic contents that EVERY adult should be enfranchised, not disenfranchised, those imprisoned should have political representation - through which they can work to right the civil, civic, and cumulative wrongs of their environment to ensure, for example, that all kids learn to read - get literacy, and status and can feel proud of themselves and take their place in the community.

lchic - 07:03am Aug 23, 2002 EST (# 3920 of 3932)

Status credentials careers
http://www.careertools.org/rlib/doc_display.asp?docn=8065

http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=status

Showalter - did you get that 'letter' from the CIA to give you the STATUS to function ?

Back to Showalter rshow55 8/22/02 9:18pm

lchic - 08:14am Aug 23, 2002 EST (# 3921 of 3932)

GU
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Documentaries/

rshow55 - 10:04am Aug 23, 2002 EST (# 3922 of 3932) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Draper's Dictum:

To control a given system of any kind, the control elements of the system, whether autonomic or human, must be able to effect changes in the system in times less than one fourth (and preferably one tenth) of the characteristic time of the change of the parts of the system that have to be controlled.

That is, if the control system models the thing controlled well . If the model is too simple or otherwise defective, actuation and feedback must be faster.

Control speed has to be fast enough. Faster is better. But beyond a point, not much better. We've had computers "fast enough" for a long time.

rshow55 - 10:10am Aug 23, 2002 EST (# 3923 of 3932) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

EDITORIAL OBSERVER Mayor Bloomberg's Test: Teaching the Teachers How to Teach Reading By BRENT STAPLES http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/23/opinion/23FRI4.html

New York City's schools will continue to fail at reading instruction until the system embraces methods that have been shown to work.

I'll be working out arguments that are more general- specifically keying them to reading instruction, today.

More Messages Recent Messages (9 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us