New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (3730 previous messages)

rshow55 - 08:36am Aug 16, 2002 EST (# 3731 of 3741) Delete Message

Been trying to touch and tweak a bit . . .

rshow55 - 08:37am Aug 16, 2002 EST (# 3732 of 3741) Delete Message

Carl Sagan, an old teacher and investor of mine, explained that there were things to be expected when dealing with "forces greater than himself."

He mentioned two cases especially. Going home to see his mother, and testifying before Congressional Committees.

Those were times to get a haircut.

A haircut can be worth it. There are times when only forces greater than oneself can help you.

MD3070 rshow55 7/15/02 8:42am

I tried to enlist such support a month ago - and I took analogous steps in another direction yesterday afternoon. Somebody with some rank in the foundation world could solve a problem of security clearance that involves a simple answer to a question, well witnessed and available for others to see on a routine basis. We'd have other things to talk about, as well.

3071 rshow55 7/15/02 8:42am ... 3072 lchic 7/15/02 8:54am
MD3073 rshow55 7/15/02 9:20am

Its been a month since those postings, and looking back, I'm proud of much of the work that's been put down on this thread during that month. I haven't explained some of the reasons why I think so - and maybe, after so many words, it makes sense to do so.

rshow55 - 08:39am Aug 16, 2002 EST (# 3733 of 3741) Delete Message

Some of the things that have made me most proud, most hopeful about this thread, others may value too - on the basis of common standards MD1999 rshow55 5/4/02 10:39am Other things, that I've been specially concerned about - may be less valued by others. Work on this thread, I believe, has seem boring or offensive to others -- often in just the areas I find most valuable.

Looking back on the work of this thread since September 2000, I'm proud, and feel the work has been worth it. One can trace highlights of that effort reading from #151 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/159 in Psychwar, Casablanca - - and terror . Distinguished anonymous posters have participated. http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/218

Is the work justified? Has it been useful? Can it be useful in the future?

I think so.

Does that make sense?

More Messages Recent Messages (8 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us