New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (3526 previous messages)

kalter.rauch - 06:11am Aug 7, 2002 EST (#3527 of 3545)
Earth vs <^> <^> <^>

The fact of the matter, lchic, is that it's too late for you and your ilk. Mobile battlefield microwave emitters mounted on Hum-Vees are a reality. Look it up if you wish...I DON'T CARE!!!

Very soon the US borders will be secure. You and your kind will scurry in pain back under the rocks you came from!!!

HAHAHA!!!!!!

wanderer85us - 07:58am Aug 7, 2002 EST (#3528 of 3545)
You can't know your limits, until you push yourself to the limit.

Bush's "star wars" plan is insane.

lchic - 08:29am Aug 7, 2002 EST (#3529 of 3545)

Saudi - significance of ?http://abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s642607.htm

lchic - 08:30am Aug 7, 2002 EST (#3530 of 3545)

Saudi - significance of being shunned by 'stars' ?
http://abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s642607.htm

lchic - 08:37am Aug 7, 2002 EST (#3531 of 3545)

Lewis Lapham


Interview with Lewis Lapham:
The influential editor of Harper's Magazine tells why the greatest threat to American society post September 11 comes from within. Lapham's views have seen him labelled by many as very un-American.
http://abc.net.au/foreign/comeup.htm

Lapham thinks the COLD WAR should END !

The MONEY channelled into Defense should be vastly reduced!

Americans have to review their spending, foreign policy, and philosophy.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=lewis+lapham+harper&btnG=Google+Search
http://www.google.com/search?num=20&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&newwindow=1&q=lewis+lapham+defence&btnG=Google+Search
http://www.google.com/search?num=20&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&newwindow=1&q=lewis+lapham+cold+war&btnG=Google+Search

lchic - 08:47am Aug 7, 2002 EST (#3532 of 3545)

The new wave - Democrats - Palestine
http://www.abc.net.au/foreign/stories/s637584.htm

Israel - refusenick soldiers - don't want to work in the Occupied Territories
believe there is no military solution to the intifada
http://www.sbs.com.au/dateline/

lchic - 09:00am Aug 7, 2002 EST (#3533 of 3545)

Israel - makes peace move - new plan

phased military withdrawals

lchic - 09:12am Aug 7, 2002 EST (#3534 of 3545)

Suicide bombers - said by Psych to be kids who had experienced extreme trauma!

mazza9 - 09:47am Aug 7, 2002 EST (#3535 of 3545)
"Quae cum ita sunt" Caesar's Gallic Commentaries

lchic:

I listen to the Palestinian apologists who seek to justify murder.

Rules of engagement are often exceeded and legal action is taken against the person who trasgresses.

When a Palestinian enters a civilian house and murders men women and children there is no justification. The Geneva Convention which is supposed to protect civilians is ignored.

The ABM treaty worked because both sides were willing to act in good conscience. Salt and its follow-ons have reduced nuclear arsenals in the Russia and the United States.

Until the barbaric regimes display civilied behavior they may receive civilized actions up to a point. Then let the bombs fall where they may, especially Iraq!

LouMazza

rshow55 - 10:08am Aug 7, 2002 EST (#3536 of 3545) Delete Message

"Let the bombs fall where they may. . . ."

Maybe they should fall on YOUR house -- on the people YOU care about?

Mazza, talking to you a few nights ago, for hours, I had a good deal of sympathy for your humanity, in spots.

But I left wondering. Suppose the Nazis had won the war, and gotten away totally with the extermination of the jews. If one had had occasion to talk to some "old vets" -- who had been guards in the camps - - would their talk, or attitudes, have been so different from yours?

You are stragely comfortable with mass murder - indiscriminate murder - - so long as it is "our team" that does it.

When the "other team" does it -- how easy it is for you to be indignant, and judgemental, and morally superior.

Indiscriminant murder is ugly. America's willing to do it wholesale, and has done it wholesale.

That's ugly. When the Palestinians do it, it is also ugly.

But you have to count.

More Messages Recent Messages (9 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Email to Sysop  Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us