New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (3364 previous messages)

rshow55 - 08:33pm Jul 30, 2002 EST (#3365 of 3382) Delete Message

It would be worth money, a great deal of safety, and worth honor too for leaders of nation states, all over the world, to ask that some key things about the history of the Cold War be checked.

Lies are unstable. Because they are unstable, there is a great deal of hope, if people show some reasonably courage.

Whatever your religious feelings may be, it is important to stay awake. Here's a sermon worth listening too - mostly secular after the first 9 minutes -- especially the last 30 seconds. . . http://www.wisc.edu/rshowalt/sermon.html

MD3294 rshowalt 7/26/02 7:15pm

MD3338_3340 rshow55 7/29/02 1:32pm

MD3349 rshow55 7/30/02 8:38am

How can I play it any straighter? What more could Casey, or Eisenhower, of "the average reader of The New York Times reasonably ask of me?

Postings, reposted from this thread pre-March 2002 in Psychwarfare, Casablanca -- and terror :

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/288
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/290
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/291
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/292
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/293
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/294
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/295

"I'd like to post links to a Guardian thread where I've said many of the most important things I'd like people to know. Psychwarfare, Casablanca -- and terror

including the key story, #13.. http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?7@@.ee7a163/13 ... to #23.. http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?7@@.ee7a163/24

There simply is no alternative but for us to put the Cold War behind us. And that means that some core facts - that must be clear, for any reasonable shaping of the future --- must be set out.

I think that this thread is part of that.

I'm asking that some things be checked. I believe that I deserve that much -- in the national interest, the world interest, and my own.

back tomorrow.

almarst2002 - 08:53pm Jul 30, 2002 EST (#3366 of 3382)

"to put the Cold War behind"

It was. Substituted by the HOT one.

lchic - 11:13pm Jul 30, 2002 EST (#3367 of 3382)

Hot pot
stew

    Bush in a muddle
    Stands in a puddle
    - of oil
    back-hands the rich
    - dollars
    The poor toil!
stew
Hot pot

dR2002

lchic - 11:33pm Jul 30, 2002 EST (#3368 of 3382)

Did she get a reward for stopping the next war ?

"" ... a woman who, together with her husband, makes a living combing through trash for recyclable materials, found the container ..

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/international/AP-Mexico-Missing-Iridium.html

lchic - 02:17am Jul 31, 2002 EST (#3369 of 3382)

SCRAMJET

The local U's scramjet test ... they think .. it worked this time ... before it sucided in the desert

http://www.physics.uq.edu.au/lp/lasdiag/scram.html

lchic - 02:30am Jul 31, 2002 EST (#3370 of 3382)

If this crowd don't even know who's on their staff list, then it's time they were made answerable to a Senate Committee

If they can't demonstrate Human Resources competence = can't run the shop - locally, can't function efficiently ...

rshow55 7/30/02 6:28pm

.... then we should all be scared, as these guys take the kid gloves off to run the American Foreign Policy.

Can't the USA get sufficiently organised to have foreign policy run by and from their Parliament - rather than by a bunch of folks who don't know if they are coming or going, can't get a staff directory together, can't sort our simple matters related to people - can't organise themselves to give Showalter the things in writing he requires so he can move on with 'his' life.

lchic - 02:32am Jul 31, 2002 EST (#3371 of 3382)

In Australia ASIO were put under the ministerial control of parliament. They'd done too many 'things' off their own bat - that didn't fit the national need.

lchic - 07:13am Jul 31, 2002 EST (#3372 of 3382)

GU Cartoon - Bell

http://www.guardian.co.uk/cartoons/0,7371,337484,00.html

lchic - 07:30am Jul 31, 2002 EST (#3373 of 3382)

UK ruling 'Unlawful detention of foreign nationals'

""such detentions were discriminatory and unlawful because they applied only to non-British citizens
http://www.guardian.co.uk/ukresponse/story/0,11017,766602,00.html

More Messages Recent Messages (9 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Email to Sysop  Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us