New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (3195 previous messages)

wrcooper - 11:04pm Jul 20, 2002 EST (#3196 of 3327)

And yes, based on evidence and conversation, I think the U. S. government cares what I say.

You're having delusions. Do please get help.

mazza9 - 11:09pm Jul 20, 2002 EST (#3197 of 3327)
"Quae cum ita sunt" Caesar's Gallic Commentaries

Kalter:

good post on the ABL. I'm surprised that rshowalt, (has he been blocked again only to show up in a new nom de pleume?), hasn't trotted our his silverized balloon countermeasures devices.

wrcooper? Is that you. I thought you were me?

Hey everybody, Robert is going to produce an CD of all his rigermarole, (sic), and maybe he is ...sick that is. He purports to be a mathematician. Could you imagine if he were to rewrite Einstein's E=MC2. It would have 10^google variables with an index of defintions raised 10^ googleplex. But of course that is the abridged version. Robert. Today I am Condi Rise!!!

I feel pretty, oh so pretty, I feel pretty and witty and ....Oh nevermind! Oopsn now I'm Emily Latella!

wrcooper - 11:31pm Jul 20, 2002 EST (#3198 of 3327)

mazza9 7/20/02 11:09pm

Lou,

Is that you or Condaleeza?

This is General M...er, George Johnson, no, um, it's, wait a minute, what's today's code? You gotta refresh my memory. Who am I today, anyway? Monitoring this forum is taking up a lot of my time. Between my meetings with the President, er, the boss, and my trips to Congress, no, I mean, the branch office, I tend to forget my secret identity. This guy Showalter's tying up the entire government, throwing us into throes or paroxysms of rage and doubt. If don't get a handle on him, he's gonna screw up the entire deal. MD will be killed for sure. We'll lose our lucrative defense contracts. Peace will break out. It'll be hell. And all because of this guy's incessant CHECKING. God, I hate the sound of that word. Check, check, check, check, check, check, check...! Every time he says it, it's like a stab at our jugular. I've assigned several agents to follow him around in Madison. It's costing us a bundle. What are your suggestions, Conda..., I mean George, no, I mean...who the hell are you, anyway? Hey, you don't think this post could be read by...you know...mathman, do you? It's scrambled, isn't it? George? Lou? Condaleeza? Are you there?

mazza9 - 11:50pm Jul 20, 2002 EST (#3199 of 3327)
"Quae cum ita sunt" Caesar's Gallic Commentaries

now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country!

The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog.

Blackie brown rapes our young girls, but Violet gives willingly.

To decrytp this code you can look for the codebook behind the usual bench on the Madison campus.

Luigi Vampa. {who am I?)

wrcooper - 12:10am Jul 21, 2002 EST (#3200 of 3327)

Irma Vep?

mazza9 - 12:17am Jul 21, 2002 EST (#3201 of 3327)
"Quae cum ita sunt" Caesar's Gallic Commentaries

Alles Galle in tres partum divisa est!

wrcooper - 12:41am Jul 21, 2002 EST (#3202 of 3327)

Luigi Vampa?

I dunno. Here's one:

"Luv, I am a pig."

Three parts?

"I limp guava"?

wrcooper - 12:45am Jul 21, 2002 EST (#3203 of 3327)

Lou, I don't think these posts are dignified enough for the likes of Condleeza Rice and the eminent science writer, George Johnson. Not to mention the CIA snoops who're poring over Mr. Check-It's contributions. So, who is Luigi?

lchic - 01:16am Jul 21, 2002 EST (#3204 of 3327)

WYSIWYG Showalter is always Showalter a real person listed in the Madison phone book, he says, RING and CHECK!

Who pretends to be who on the thread?

George Johnson who likes to think of himself as an eminent nyt sci reporter ... pretends and playacts and one presumes is handsomely paid by the ShadowGovernment out of tax payer's pockets for the repetitive banalities dashed under hack-pen-name monikers:

wrcooper

mazza9

kalter.rauch

zulphia

REAL bona fida Journalists work under ethical guidelines ... listed here http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=journalism+ethics&btnG=Google+Search

Whenever Johnson scribbles on the forum there will be one of two reasons - he's looking for wordage to submit as evidence for payment, or, he's told to do so to distance the reader from a batch of postings that get at the truths the Shadow Government wants to cover-up and hide.

A lot of Johnson ... has to mean a lot of pertinent postings prior to his showing!

lchic - 01:35am Jul 21, 2002 EST (#3205 of 3327)

Afghanistan - women - Bare faced resistance
Natasha Walter reports from Kabul on what the future holds for the women of Afghanistan
The Guardian Saturday July 20, 2002


..... . "And every morning we would go out and help to collect the dead bodies. There was nothing to think about. We were just waiting for our death ....

http://www.guardian.co.uk/afghanistan/story/0,1284,757607,00.html

More Messages Recent Messages (122 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Email to Sysop  Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us