New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (3142 previous messages)

kalter.rauch - 04:24am Jul 19, 2002 EST (#3143 of 3339)
Earth vs <^> <^> <^>

mazza9 7/17/02 3:12pm

I was drawn to this forum by the premise stated regarding Missile Defense. I didn't join to have words with lchic who needs a tutorial in Emily Post polite behavior.

When they continue their rudeness I ignore them.

Uhhh...Pardon Me, Mr. Lou Mazza, but from what I've seen in these forums you ignore all kinds of people who aren't even rude to you. If you're going to rely on Emily Post's dictums on civility then you should at least practice what you preach. I mean, how rude do you think YOU appear when you pointedly ignore posts directed to you which ARE "on topic" AND respectful of your "sensibilities".

Personally, I think Emily Post must be the ultimate Prima Donna. She's like the "Princess and The Pea" who was intolerably irritated, in spite of mountains of soft padding, by what everyone else would regard as insignificant.

There's only ONE PERSON I totally ignore in ALL the NYT forums and she knows why! I joined NYT forums when they were still posting people's e-mail links. Within a week this airhead was sending me messages demanding to know whether or not I was "Psrain", along with a pile of crap about who she hated and wanted to get banned. I told her what I thought of her, and ever since then she pops into forums to push MY "hot buttons".

Now, you must realize that the nature of this topic is one bound to inflame people one way or the other. That's why fanatic left-wing sell-outs like lchic exercise their scatological impulses with their nasty NAZI smears. They mustn't be ignored! Rather, they must be FORCED into submission by a bombastic blitzkrieg of balderdash......

lchic - 04:54am Jul 19, 2002 EST (#3144 of 3339)

LEFT
TODAY TOMORROW
Future

CENTER
Fence-Sitter

right

yesterdayMen

YESTER-U?


kalter.rauch - 05:21am Jul 19, 2002 EST (#3145 of 3339)
Earth vs <^> <^> <^>

Why Tokay?______Y2K______White OK!

"c" is for CONSPIRACY 'cause it won't work for MY slogans...but it does for YOUR'S!!!

lchic - 05:35am Jul 19, 2002 EST (#3146 of 3339)

"" For all the individual warmth and generosity

    of its citizens, the US is organised on a ruthlessly competitive principle: in life there are winners and losers.

lchic - 06:15am Jul 19, 2002 EST (#3147 of 3339)

""It's time for Congress or an outside commission to investigate our nation's biodefense program and establish oversight
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/19/opinion/19KRIS.html
Missing Anthrax / KRISTOF

kalter.rauch - 06:18am Jul 19, 2002 EST (#3148 of 3339)
Earth vs <^> <^> <^>

I grow weary...I will now seek refreshment and rest awhile......

wanderer85us - 06:51am Jul 19, 2002 EST (#3149 of 3339)
Bush and Cheney - inside traders - bad apples that need to be tossed out.

Bush's motto:

Leave no defense contractor behind.

rshowalt - 09:16am Jul 19, 2002 EST (#3150 of 3339)

Formatting's not right -- but with Mark Heuman's wonderful help I'm working to "publish" a CD that archives this thread, from the beginning, with some collected searches and comment. Eventually with a search facility, and other things useful for "connecting the dots." Here, not exactly as it appears, but with the content, is the index page, as now:

M. Robert Showalter: Missile Defense Archive

Calendar of NYTimes Missile Defense Discussion

Auxiliary and Summary Files


(more)

More Messages Recent Messages (189 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Email to Sysop  Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us