New York Times on the Web Forums
Resource
Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(17688 previous messages)
cantabb
- 10:13am Nov 14, 2003 EST (#
17689 of 17697)
Jorian:
Thanks for info on the Song.
On '25 years of Svience News': It's closely monitored. So,
no worry.
I posted once or twice there. But as far as I could tell,
they just wanted to have readers' top-pick -- and that'll
mostly depend on one's own discipline [would be too
presumptuous of me, eg, to pick to something in physics, not
my area]. Besides, very hard to pick ONE, in some areas. They
asked you to discuss your pick -- BUT that doesn't mean an
exchange among posters, which's what I've also seen.
I just listed my Top 5, and said why !
Interesting review though.
cantabb
- 10:15am Nov 14, 2003 EST (#
17690 of 17697)
I see typos in my last post. Pls ignore.
bluestar23
- 10:26am Nov 14, 2003 EST (#
17691 of 17697)
Yep, I think somehow Showalter figured we'd all step in for
a while, then disappear and he'd be back to "normal"....but
one can't let Showalter go un-answered, as I think we've
decided...
fredmoore
- 10:27am Nov 14, 2003 EST (#
17692 of 17697)
Meanwhile down in the barnyard Robert's copping a fierce
pecking from that shagnasty rooster (doesn't even know he's a
chook ...dumb as a pile of rocks) Canthorn Tabbhorn:
I doubt he'll include all the posts TILL Nov
14. Bwark-bwuk bwuk bwk That will be self-imploding !
Bwark-bwuk bwuk bwk But he has NOT said yet Bwark-bwuk bwuk
bwk IF his "corpus" CD is a Bwark-bwuk bwuk bwk TRUE copy
Bwark-bwuk bwuk bwk of everything on this thread till Nov
14. Bwark-bwuk bwuk bwk
No peck-and-choose selectivity. Bwark-bwuk
bwuk bwk rshow and lchic don't seem ready Bwark-bwuk bwuk
bwk or so "happy" to leave -- YET Bwark-bwuk bwuk bwk !
Still ranting, still demanding ! Bwark-bwarkk bwaark
bwaaaaark I expect their posting frenzy will continue till
the end. Bwark-bwuk bwuk bwk
Am glad, in a way, kate-nyt gave NO time for
the axe. Bwark-bwuk bwuk bwk To put them out of their
misery,Bwark-bwuk bwuk bwk the sooner the better Bwark-bwuk
bwuk bwk -- how about a minute past midnight tonight
Bwark-bwuk bwuk bwk ? That'll be Nov 14, won't it ?
Bwark-bwarkk bwaark bwaaaark. Now where's that nice little
Lchicky wicky?
Canthorn, still smarting over your loss of face from YOUR
Science in the News fiasco where you proclaim that only you
have a right to an opinion. MY opinion still stands ... go
figure.
Your failure to cut the muster here ... your
incompetence ... none of my concern!
Unfortunately for you I can cut the mustard .... you
lose.
cantabb
- 10:59am Nov 14, 2003 EST (#
17693 of 17697)
fredmoore - 10:27am Nov 14, 2003 EST (# 17692 of
17692)
See what the veld-cat dragged in --- more out of the
barnyard -- this time a re-hash:
How many times yiu want to post this,
freddie"Irregardless"moore ? Trying to emulate your leader
?
Meanwhile down in the barnyard Robert's
copping a fierce pecking from that shagnasty rooster
(doesn't even know he's a chook ...dumb as a pile of rocks)
Canthorn Tabbhorn: ......
Canthorn, still smarting over your loss of
face from YOUR Science in the News fiasco where you proclaim
that only you have a right to an opinion. MY opinion still
stands ... go figure. go figure.
Parroting again. Don't they teach anything else in the barn
??
Too bad about your raw nerve: must be pretty sore by now !
Your problem: Comprehension. Nothing more.
For others [who can still see the linked exchange] your
ignorance was LOUD and CLEAR. On Freedom of speech American-
style (not veld-)! And ah, "Muster/Mustard," ! And,
"the demigogues of truth," "Mexican stand-off"....
!
From cantabb - 01:36am Nov 14, 2003 EST (# 17675 of 17678),
READ this, slowly & with comprehension: http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?1@13.4RlJbAoIXD9.0@.f28e622/19390
From Cantabb # 1489, May 16, 03, “Science in the News” http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?1@13.4RlJbAoIXD9.0@.f2e4e35/1657
To cantabb - # 1568 , May 20, 03 “Science in the News” http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?1@13.4RlJbAoIXD9.0@.f2e4e35/1738
This exchange continued, off and on, for 2 days.
Your failure to cut the muster here ... your
incompetence ... none of my concern!
"Pass MUSTER" -- "Pass MUSTER" ! Got it ?
Root of your "incompetence" -- comprehension !
Unfortunately for you I can cut the mustard
.... you lose.
You may have learned that today, BUT you could NOT 'pass
muster' in "Science in the News" !
That goes with "Irregardless," "hipocracy" and the rest
[incl. Mme Lafarge/Defarge ]! Your "corpus" is also getting
bigger !
you lose.
Back to schoolyard, eh ?
From barnyard to school yard, dragging things from the
former (or fArmer?] to the latter.
I see you've been using the shovel I gave you. Keep at it,
freddieboy !
(4 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Resource
Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators Missile Defense
|