New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (17519 previous messages)

cantabb - 12:09pm Nov 13, 2003 EST (# 17520 of 17528)

BlueS:

He has NOT made any sense for the past 3+years here, ain't it unreasonable of you to expect in the final day-and-half, under so much stress ?

rshow55 - 12:12pm Nov 13, 2003 EST (# 17521 of 17528)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

"Why are you so concerned what anyone would say about you (without your knowledge) ? "

ARE YOU KIDDING ? DO YOU INHABIT PLANET EARTH ?

That's the most insensitive thing I think I've ever heard. If a NYT employee said that - he should be cashieired .

rshow55 - 12:15pm Nov 13, 2003 EST (# 17522 of 17528)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

cantabb: " final day-and-half "

Say it ain't so. I was so looking forward to having the thread go down at midnight tonight .

lchic - 12:18pm Nov 13, 2003 EST (# 17523 of 17528)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

cashiered
    from : Dutch casseren, from Old French casser, to dismiss, annul. / quash

lchic - 12:34pm Nov 13, 2003 EST (# 17524 of 17528)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

Cantabbulation - 58 days of it - TWO months - weeks + weekends

think of sickdays and vacations ---

that's almost 1/4 of the workingYear

and come to think of it the ECHOING CANTABBULATOR was sick - most days

and then there was Blue and Fred and 'The Poster'

and Jorian

So how was this effort funded .... internal to NYT does NYT have an alliance with some sort of Agency --- if that's taxpayerfunded -- who makes the dollar decisions?

------

Cantabbulator book yourself in for a 'refit' at the workshop Friday ... with luck you'll emerge 'your old self' again .... if only those guys at the 'shop' can persever with the loop testing.

________

________

rshow55 - 12:42pm Nov 13, 2003 EST (# 17525 of 17528)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

If a New York Times reporter or editor can actually ask

" Why are you so concerned what anyone would say about you (without your knowledge) ? "

and not know the answer - that explains a lot about the relationship between the NYT and the rest of the world that ought to be fixed.

If the point can be made by a responsible person at the Times who doesn't know how crucial and sensitive the issue is - that explains a lot, too.

For example, it explains a lot about how the Jayson Blair business could have happened. People are generally so afraid of the NYT that people in it have become totally lacking in knowledge and feeling in crucial areas.

bluestar23 - 12:51pm Nov 13, 2003 EST (# 17526 of 17528)

The only decision the NYT has made is to shut down this Forum within 24 hours....Showalter's imagined "relationship" or, the "relationship" that he desires to have, belongs to that world of patanoid fixations and personal confusion tht characterize everything he does...

More Messages Recent Messages (2 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense