New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (17418 previous messages)

cantabb - 03:57pm Nov 12, 2003 EST (# 17419 of 17422)

lchic - 03:39pm Nov 12, 2003 EST (# 17412 of 17414)

From the TOP cantabb - once again -

More prattle !

Is it raining in the Cantabbulator's Canyon : YES or NO

YES, on your & rshow's parade.

What canyon ? You mean the ECHOes of "Ignore charade," "Inane," "nonsense," "preposterous" YOU hear ?

sorry couldn't hear that for the 'echo...echo...echo...echo'

We call it "Tinnitus' here ! Ask your doctor to check !

lchic - 03:42pm Nov 12, 2003 EST (# 17413 of 17414)

Iraq - Alex was against 'going in'

So what ? Millions in this country were against it too.

Iraq - I was reading about it just a moment ago in The Australian!

About 'Alex -against going in..'? Sorry to see telegraphic-cryptography reduced to such incoherence.

Cantabb is going to ask 'where's the MD in that?'

To you, everything has been relevant to this, now comatose thread (thanks to you & rshow). You see MD everywhere....

lchic - 04:00pm Nov 12, 2003 EST (# 17420 of 17422)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

Rupert's out poaching ...

http://media.guardian.co.uk/presspublishing/story/0,7495,1083539,00.html

Julie Burchill / New York Post (errr)

cantabb - 04:03pm Nov 12, 2003 EST (# 17421 of 17422)

lchic - 03:44pm Nov 12, 2003 EST (# 17415 of 17419)

M D many dead

M M D many many dead

M D more dollars

M M D many more dollars

More prattle !

lchic - 03:45pm Nov 12, 2003 EST (# 17416 of 17419)

Exactly Cantabb wrt this thread you have been something of a WangkerRoo!

What ? Some Oz-speak again ?

You are degenerating, World Asset/rshow-Bouncer !

Don't take it that hard -- there are STILL a few more NYT forums for you to 'infect'.

THE END IS NEAR, World Asset/rshow-bouncer !

More Messages Recent Messages (1 following message)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense