New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(17394 previous messages)
rshow55
- 11:32am Nov 12, 2003 EST (#
17395 of 17401) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
cantabb - 10:48am Nov 12, 2003 EST (# 17391 of
17393) is a fascinating post - and exactly
backwards. Which is hopeful - just a sign switch, and a lot
would sort out. I got a warm and fuzzy feeling ( search
topic ) when I read this from cantabb:
lchic - 09:25am Nov 12, 2003 EST (# 17385 of 17387)
"Showalter has placed emphasis on the need
to learn how to negotiate He should know that you can NOT
negotiate anything -- much less effectively or well -- with
highly ambiguous statements, disjointed thoughts/logic and
paranoia-driven speculations and irrationality.
. . .
"And even in ‘the same’ language, if one
side is too fuzzy (in thinking, words and logic), extremely
unfocused, has unsubstantiated facts and is given to
irrationality, you can kiss any hope of negotiation
good-bye.
To get to an initial focus where there is a
chance for mutual accomodation - where people
know enough - highly ambiguous statements,
disjointed thoughts/logic - "paranoia-driven speculations" and
irrationality are just what you need.
And TYPICAL of real human negotiation when it is
successful. You need clarity in the end .
NOT before needs are known, weights are known, and it
is possible to "AGREE TO AGREE OR DISAGREE"
clearly and in enough detail to have the agreement
work.
People who tape record good negotiators at work and
actually read the transcripts can't escape knowing that. And
they do.
Beautiful, crystal clear negotiations happen after a
lot of initial focusing. Disciplined beauty -
compactness and fit - happen AFTER people get focused.
bluestar23
- 11:41am Nov 12, 2003 EST (#
17396 of 17401)
"You weren't even able to say (let alone 'condense') what
you've been working on, on MD, and what fraction of what you
have often claimed you have achieved..."
You only have today and tommorrow, Mr. Showalter, to
explain in plain language the sum of your particular
"achievements" on this thread over three years of
"effort"....If you choose not to explain yourself in any way
to the other posters, and the NYT,in the next 48 hours, this
may be taken for an admission that you have in fact
"accomplished" Nothing.
bluestar23
- 11:46am Nov 12, 2003 EST (#
17397 of 17401)
http://www.sltrib.com/2003/Nov/11122003/business/110180.asp
New airplane-based MD Concept....
bluestar23
- 11:47am Nov 12, 2003 EST (#
17398 of 17401)
from the above:
By John Hughes Bloomberg News
Northrop Grumman Corp., which equips U.S. military aircraft
with missile defenses, said Tuesday that it can put similar
technology on 300 commercial jets used to transport troops and
supplies within a year if the government approves.
The deployment would cost $810 million if done over a year
or $600 million in about 18 months, company Vice President
Robert Del Boca said at a Washington news conference. The
systems would detect and with a laser deflect shoulder-fired
missiles, he said.
Raytheon Co., BAE Systems Plc and Alliant Techsystems,
which said it's teaming with UAL Corp.'s United Airlines, are
also competing to develop defense systems for civilian planes,
company representatives said.
The Department of Homeland Security plans to spend $100
million in the next two years to develop defenses against the
threat of terrorists using shoulder-fired missiles to try to
down jetliners. There are probably more than 500,000 portable
missile launchers worldwide, including some held by 27
nongovernment groups, according to a House aviation
subcommittee memo.
(3 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|