New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (17365 previous messages)

cantabb - 12:28am Nov 12, 2003 EST (# 17366 of 17372)

rshow55 - 08:38pm Nov 11, 2003 EST (# 17359 of 17365)

I don't feel in a hurry. This thread has had a lot of support.

Which's why it is being shut down..

There's nothing I can write, just now, any better than the extensive collection of good stuff in ... That seems enough, for a thread that nobody cares about that nobody affiliated with the NYT posts on.

I think people cared enough to see it put out of its misery this late in the game.

rshow55 - 09:12pm Nov 11, 2003 EST (# 17360 of 17365)

If the "story" here ... hadn't been true in key essentials - my guess is that the NYT would have found a way, one way or another, to shut this thread down long ago.....

Or, blocked you -- effectively and early -- to end your abuse of this thread...

lchic - 10:08pm Nov 11, 2003 EST (# 17361 of 17365)

Journalism .... if that's to do with writing a journal .... Showalter you're more practised at it than I.

Aww, mutual appreciation...

Has anyone here ever considered becoming a journalist, taking this and that's of information, spiraling them around ... 'til they're spun dry-text, sending them off to an editor to blue-line and bottom draw for later publication - perhaps, perhaps, perhaps.

You and rshow do all that so well ...

Who'd want to do that?

Do we have to ?

What do you do while waiting for "TRUTH" to "ultimately" come out. Make it up for fun ?

bluestar23 - 01:10am Nov 12, 2003 EST (# 17367 of 17372)

lchic - 12:24pm Nov 10, 2003 BST (#1254 of 1255)

Weathering the storm

Showalter Index (SI): The SI is dependent upon 850 mb data and is most reliable when the moist layer extends above the 850 mb level. The SI is determined by following the moist-adiabat from the 850 mb based LCL to 500 mb, and then subtracting the found temperature from the 500 mb sounding temperature.

bluestar23 - 01:12am Nov 12, 2003 EST (# 17368 of 17372)

You see, the problem in talking to them is that they're...M. A. D....

bluestar23 - 01:55am Nov 12, 2003 EST (# 17369 of 17372)

I sincerely hope "our" rshow55 didn't come up with the "Showalter Index"....

lchic - 04:53am Nov 12, 2003 EST (# 17370 of 17372)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

The S's are all related (a port of entry quirk re spelling) - but no, not RS

Good to see you're a guardian devote Blue-y!

More Messages Recent Messages (2 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense