New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (17247 previous messages)

cantabb - 09:47am Nov 11, 2003 EST (# 17248 of 17271)

bluestar23 - 09:42am Nov 11, 2003 EST (# 17243 of 17246)

"So I can actually act"

I thought his was already an 'act' !

lchic - 09:48am Nov 11, 2003 EST (# 17249 of 17271)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

War is a HEALTH HAZARD - Iraq - longer term future

"" conflict disrupted immunisation programmes and destroyed water systems, increasing levels of disease.

Environmental degradation and smoke from oil fires are adding to the health problems of Iraqis, it reports.

Continuing insecurity in Iraq, along with the breakdown of public health services, are exacerbating the problem.

Death toll

Entitled Continuing Collateral Damage: the health and environmental costs of war on Iraq, the report estimates that between 22,000 and 55,000 people - mainly Iraqi soldiers and civilians - died as a direct result of the war.

cantabb - 09:51am Nov 11, 2003 EST (# 17250 of 17271)

fredmoore - 09:46am Nov 11, 2003 EST (# 17247 of 17248)

Barntabb the delusional arrogater.

Parroting again, freddie"Irregardless"moore ?

Is it supposed to make sense, outside your veld barn ?

See, I can demolish you in just 2 lines. You miss the point in 9.

Looks like you demolished yourself -- IF that was possible after all those self-inflicted wounds !

You had NO "point" -- for me to miss !

Continued bleating from freddiemoore ! In the final days -- you'll out of your misery soon !

lchic - 09:55am Nov 11, 2003 EST (# 17251 of 17271)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

“A nation apart”, the very phrase “American exceptionalism” that is so often heard these days was first coined by Alexis de Tocqueville in 1835-40, when that brilliant Frenchman wrote his “Democracy in America”. Many of the things he pointed out then as profound differences between America and other countries continue to be remarked upon today—its vociferous democracy, its decentralisation, its liking for voluntary associations, the intensity of its people's religious belief. Even during the cold war, which critics like now to describe as a time when fear of the Soviet Union acted as a bond between Americans and others, today's sorts of worries were commonplace. Graham Greene's “The Quiet American” (1955) complained that naive American idealists did more damage than good. Countless films, whether made by Americans or by foreigners, raised worries about a sinister military-industrial complex, about reds-under-the-bed obsessiveness, about zealotry.

http://www.economist.com/opinion/displayStory.cfm?story_id=2189509

lchic - 10:01am Nov 11, 2003 EST (# 17252 of 17271)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

Why does the NYT have half a dozen guys sitting on this thread ?

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---

This little thread

'they say' unread

is 'monitored'

until

it's dead!?!

----

cantabb - 10:25am Nov 11, 2003 EST (# 17253 of 17271)

lchic - 10:01am Nov 11, 2003 EST (# 17252 of 17252)

Why does the NYT have half a dozen guys sitting on this thread ?

It was NICE, wasn't it, with just rshow and you -- along with 'Clinton' & 'Putin'?

This little thread 'they say' unread is 'monitored' until it's dead!?!

This "little" thread [the so-called "Corpus"] is now more than 17,250 posts, mostly full of the non-science, political and personal problems -- ALL rehashed, periodically. More posts here than in any other Science forum.

If you think there are at least half a dozen NYT guys 'monitoring' -- may be to observe the 'last rites' and elegiac outpouring ?

More Messages Recent Messages (18 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense