New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (17131 previous messages)

lchic - 02:57pm Nov 10, 2003 EST (# 17132 of 17142)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

'Nobody does it better .... '

lchic - 02:58pm Nov 10, 2003 EST (# 17133 of 17142)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

blue Astrols are fully employed -- Nancy Diana etc -- get on their wait-list

lchic - 02:59pm Nov 10, 2003 EST (# 17134 of 17142)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

Cantabb conceded - 'lchic is a world asset'

cantabb - 03:00pm Nov 10, 2003 EST (# 17135 of 17142)

Bluestar:

Because it's ALL in the stars. And how can they miss.

They just have to 'read' to their customers.

Sure, they can forsee for all humanity -- except where their new customer is ging to come from, and more importantly, WHEN, and with how much $$ !

cantabb - 03:01pm Nov 10, 2003 EST (# 17136 of 17142)

lchic - 02:59pm Nov 10, 2003 EST (# 17134 of 17135)

Cantabb conceded - 'lchic is a world asset'

In mimicking Churchill...

cantabb - 03:03pm Nov 10, 2003 EST (# 17137 of 17142)

Rshow's Nap is pretty long -- must have been somebody's wonderful 'lullaby'.

lchic - 03:05pm Nov 10, 2003 EST (# 17138 of 17142)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

making 'unknown's knowns' ...

lchic - 03:07pm Nov 10, 2003 EST (# 17139 of 17142)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

Here's a known ---- future needs

Here's an unknown --- meeting future needs

lchic - 03:08pm Nov 10, 2003 EST (# 17140 of 17142)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

Here's known - "The technology is ALL there" (Showalter)

lchic - 03:10pm Nov 10, 2003 EST (# 17141 of 17142)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

Here's a second Known -- "NEGOTIATION is complex" (Showalter)

More Messages Recent Messages (1 following message)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense