New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(16977 previous messages)
lchic
- 03:12am Nov 9, 2003 EST (#
16978 of 16986) ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has
to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong
foundation
US troops yesterday unleashed their most furious attack in
Iraq since the official end of the war. The attacks, which
happened in Saddam Hussein's home town of Tikrit, were carried
out in response to the killing of six soldiers whose Black
Hawk helicopter was shot down near the town on Friday.
As F16s jets dropped 500lb bombs on the area where the
helicopter was shot down, US troops launched a massive sweep
operation, designed as a show of force against resistance
fighters based in the Sunni Triangle, which saw the arrest of
several dozen alleged fighters and the death of five more.
Last night a loud explosion echoed across Baghdad. The
sound came from the West bank of the Tigris River, where the
coaltion has its headquarters. It follows mortar attacks on
the complex earlier in the week.
The US assault follows a sharp escalation in attacks by the
Iraqi guerrillas on US targets, which have claimed 34 American
lives in the first seven days of November, equivalent to the
total fatalities in all of October. http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1081221,00.html
But any hope that the sweep - named Operation Ivy Cyclone -
would steady nerves in Iraq was almost immediately demolished
by the news that the International Committee of the Red Cross
was taking the drastic step of closing its offices in Baghdad
and Basra because of the rapidly worsening security situation.
The organisation had already announced that it was reducing
the number of its international staff after the bombing of its
headquarters in Baghdad on 27 October in which 12 people died.
The decision to close its offices in Baghdad and Basra,
however, is a blow to an organisation that prides itself on
being able to continue working in the worst of conflict
situations. 'We are discussing what to do with our foreign
staff. The situation is dangerous and volatile,' ICRC
spokesman Florian Westphal said.
Despite the US military operation, however, lethal attacks
on US forces continued yesterday with two US paratroopers
killed in the Sunni Triangle town of Falluja when a roadside
bomb exploded under their vehicle.
Amid suspicions that the bombing raids were designed as
much for domestic US consumption as out of operational
necessity, a coalition spokesman announced that it had also
captured 12 people suspected of involvement in a deadly attack
on a Baghdad hotel where US Deputy Defence Secretary Paul
Wolfowitz was staying.
Military officers said the operation involved raids on
several locations. They said they believed they had broken up
a cell of former regime figures which included a financier, a
supplier and operatives.
The arrests and the launch of Operation Ivy Cyclone came,
however, amid more bad news for the Bush administration over
its handling of post-war Iraq.
An official US army review leaked to the US NGO
globalsecurity.org has revealed that the army had no plan for
the occupation of Baghdad.
Officially titled the Third Infantry Division (Mechanised)
After Action Report, Operation Iraqi Freedom, the study
provides the first formal internal view of the Iraq war from
the point of view of the soldiers who brought down Saddam
Hussein.
The report provides official confirmation of a complete
absence of high-level military and political planning to
manage the aftermath of victory and indicates some key
problems that continue to hamper US army effectiveness to this
day.
Some of the lack of planning first became apparent at
Baghdad International Airport (BIA): 'Multiple military and
inter-agency organisations vied to set up operations at BIA,
but the (3rd Infantry) Brigade Combat Team controlling BIA was
too engaged in continu ing combat operations to coordinate
this adequately.'
The report continues that the 3rd Infantry Division itself,
which had been engaged in some of the heaviest fighting on the
outskirts of Baghdad, 'lacked guidance' on how to deal with
the different competing
lchic
- 03:14am Nov 9, 2003 EST (#
16979 of 16986) ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has
to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong
foundation
The report continues that the 3rd Infantry Division itself,
which had been engaged in some of the heaviest fighting on the
outskirts of Baghdad, 'lacked guidance' on how to deal with
the different competing Iraqis they encountered. 'Ongoing
struggles for power, establishing security without the benefit
of a functioning police system, and re-establishing a pay
system for government workers continue to plague the
restoration of "normalcy" to Baghdad,' it said.
The report comes amid mounting criticism of the way the
Bush administration has handled the aftermath of the invasion.
US hopes that up to 10,000 Turkish troops would be deployed to
bolster the US effort were dashed on Friday when Turkey
decided not to send troops into Iraq.
lchic
- 03:43am Nov 9, 2003 EST (#
16980 of 16986) ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has
to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong
foundation
Red cross and Red cresent should merge (globalise) and
morph their icons - be less of a target
(6 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|