New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(16962 previous messages)
lchic
- 07:54pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (#
16963 of 16986) ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has
to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong
foundation
The long history of missile defense - star wars
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/documentaries/storyville/woodhead-star-wars.shtml
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/documentaries/storyville/star-wars-dreams.shtml
Star Wars - how it 'might' work
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/in_depth/americas/2001/us_missile_defence/default.stm
slides 4 and 5 above are problematic - right ?
Q & A http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/696028.stm
bravo for J
lchic
- 08:08pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (#
16964 of 16986) ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has
to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong
foundation
MEast turn right then south --- News Headers
http://www.arabnews.com/
http://www.adl.org/PresRele/IslME_62/4163_62.asp
http://www.gulf-news.com/
Yesterday's news
-------
Listing of world ENGLISH on line Newspaper
lchic
- 08:10pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (#
16965 of 16986) ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has
to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong
foundation
(English on line Newspapers)
cantabb
- 08:20pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (#
16966 of 16986)
lchic - 07:08pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16945 of 16963)
To
lchic - 07:43pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16960 of 16963)
and to lchic - 07:54pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16964 of 169634)
interrupted only by 1 post from Jorian (16961).
Another string of about 20 posts on everything under the
sun, including a little on MD. Link-machine is working over
time today.
She has still NOT provided any information on who's she
working for, and what interests is she representing here so
blindly and loyally.
With her overt bias and gross disregard of objectivity and
balance -- qualities she seems to share with her leader --
it's difficult to take her link-machine and her comments and
criticism seriously or attach much of any credibility them.
(20 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|