New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (16860 previous messages)

cantabb - 01:04pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16861 of 16986)

klsanford0 - 12:51pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16857 of 16860)

Yep, that's what WRCooper was trying to do after months of playing an entirely different game. That's what I was telling him; that and his ill-concealed intellectual snobbery based on: exactly Nothing. Or to his mind: based on (what he doesn't understand) is an anti-intellectual argument in the first place. To base one's whole thinking about the multi-layered and complex MD to just one argument....that WRC knows, magically, that any old countermeasure anyone happens to dream up will instantly and totally defeat any known Missile Defense. That's his idea of being an intellectual. One can see that people like WRCooper were always really part of the problem on this Forum; and not a solution to anything.

NOW, he's going to put YOU back on his "ignore" list. That'll teach you -- for being so disrespectful of those who say they know everything !

:)

klsanford0 - 12:54pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16859 of 16860)

Cantabb: Look at it this way...every second, every minute, brings us closer to seeing the end of the utterly ridiculous lchic and her mentally-ill "partner" Showalter....they can strut their insanity and yell and scream all they want, but the end is near...

And, I am trying to oblige them.....

Where's milk of human kindness ? Euthansia !

lchic - 01:14pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16862 of 16986)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

Stauber : The war is very much ongoing. It's now a guerrilla war and we are not going to see the major media publicizing this information in a book. We are not going to see the major media calling for a thorough investigation of the deception and the selling of the war because they were so involved in promoting the war.

http://www.guerrillanews.com/war_on_terrorism/doc2332.html

cantabb - 01:15pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16863 of 16986)

lchic - 12:55pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16860 of 16861)

Showtime Cantabb - POST YOUR MD CONTRIBUTION

In case you didn't notice, I have been busy commenting on and discussing YOUR and rshow's MD contributions. Did you see my response this morning to a series of your 22 contributions suposedly on MD ?

Repeat after me: S-P-A-M !

Anymore of YOUR MD contributions I can also discuss ?

SHOWTIME: What's you employment affiliation, lchic ? What is YOUR real iunterest in this thread -- other than "spamming" it with anything and everything un-related to MD, but critical of US & your Commandant demands about everyone else's employer, EXCEPT of course yours ! Is this "TRUTH" gonna be let out soon ?

cantabb - 01:18pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16864 of 16986)

lchic - 01:14pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16862 of 16863)

Stauber : The war is very much ongoing. It's now a guerrilla war and we are not going to see the major media publicizing this information in a book. We are not going to see the major media calling for a thorough investigation of the deception and the selling of the war because they were so involved in promoting the war.

http://www.guerrillanews.com/bunker/bunker_archive/doc1529.html http://www.guerrillanews.com/war_on_terrorism/doc2332.html

Is this what you call MD-related ?

Sorry, I asked. To you and rshow55, EVERYTHING is or can be made to be related to MD ? Why change this 3-year old view, right ?

bbbuck - 01:20pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16865 of 16986)

Boy the klanman sure has a lot of hate bottled up.

Check his hate-log in western-europe moderated.

Sling the hate klanman, a good hatemonger is always welcome.

klsanford0 - 01:24pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16866 of 16986)

Cantabb:

Why do you bother "fisking" idiot lchic? She rather obviously has no mind....no mental ability at all. If possible, (and in her own way) she is as bad as Showalter....in some respects worse...best left alone to screech at nothing until this Forum shuts down....

More Messages Recent Messages (120 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense