New York Times on the Web Forums
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
(16860 previous messages)
- 01:04pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (#
16861 of 16986)
klsanford0 - 12:51pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16857 of 16860)
Yep, that's what WRCooper was trying to do
after months of playing an entirely different game. That's
what I was telling him; that and his ill-concealed
intellectual snobbery based on: exactly Nothing. Or to his
mind: based on (what he doesn't understand) is an
anti-intellectual argument in the first place. To base one's
whole thinking about the multi-layered and complex MD to
just one argument....that WRC knows, magically, that any old
countermeasure anyone happens to dream up will instantly and
totally defeat any known Missile Defense. That's his idea of
being an intellectual. One can see that people like WRCooper
were always really part of the problem on this Forum; and
not a solution to anything.
NOW, he's going to put YOU back on his "ignore" list.
That'll teach you -- for being so disrespectful of those who
say they know everything !
klsanford0 - 12:54pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16859 of 16860)
Cantabb: Look at it this way...every second,
every minute, brings us closer to seeing the end of the
utterly ridiculous lchic and her mentally-ill "partner"
Showalter....they can strut their insanity and yell and
scream all they want, but the end is near...
And, I am trying to oblige them.....
Where's milk of human kindness ? Euthansia !
- 01:14pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (#
16862 of 16986)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has
to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong
Stauber : The war is very much ongoing. It's now a
guerrilla war and we are not going to see the major media
publicizing this information in a book. We are not going to
see the major media calling for a thorough investigation of
the deception and the selling of the war because they were so
involved in promoting the war.
- 01:15pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (#
16863 of 16986)
lchic - 12:55pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16860 of 16861)
Showtime Cantabb - POST YOUR MD CONTRIBUTION
In case you didn't notice, I have been busy commenting on
and discussing YOUR and rshow's MD contributions. Did you see
my response this morning to a series of your 22 contributions
suposedly on MD ?
Repeat after me: S-P-A-M !
Anymore of YOUR MD contributions I can also discuss ?
SHOWTIME: What's you employment affiliation, lchic ? What
is YOUR real iunterest in this thread -- other than "spamming"
it with anything and everything un-related to MD, but critical
of US & your Commandant demands about everyone else's
employer, EXCEPT of course yours ! Is this "TRUTH" gonna be
let out soon ?
- 01:18pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (#
16864 of 16986)
lchic - 01:14pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16862 of 16863)
Stauber : The war is very much ongoing. It's
now a guerrilla war and we are not going to see the major
media publicizing this information in a book. We are not
going to see the major media calling for a thorough
investigation of the deception and the selling of the war
because they were so involved in promoting the war.
Is this what you call MD-related ?
Sorry, I asked. To you and rshow55, EVERYTHING is or can be
made to be related to MD ? Why change this 3-year old view,
- 01:20pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (#
16865 of 16986)
Boy the klanman sure has a lot of hate bottled up.
Check his hate-log in western-europe moderated.
Sling the hate klanman, a good hatemonger is always
- 01:24pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (#
16866 of 16986)
Why do you bother "fisking" idiot lchic? She rather
obviously has no mind....no mental ability at all. If
possible, (and in her own way) she is as bad as
Showalter....in some respects worse...best left alone to
screech at nothing until this Forum shuts down....
(120 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums