New York Times on the Web Forums Science

Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.

lchic - 12:47pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16854 of 16986)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

media reform link

http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.QYGebtFbWso.2337098@.f28e622/18546

-----

LIVE coverage broadcast through the net

Guerrilla News Network (GNN), and WORT 89.9 FM

cantabb - 12:47pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16855 of 16986)

lchic - 12:38pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16852 of 16853)

spamming

Spamming, in general, is an attempt to feed misleading information to search engines

Cantabb neither searches nor is he an engine!

Your definition for your canyons !

See this:

"Spam: To barrage a message board, newsgroup, or e-mail address with inappropriate, ireelevant, or simply numerous copies of the same post ( as in cross-posting)...." According to 'The Official America Online Tour Guide": Tom Lichty & Jennifer Watson, 4th edition.

See if these shoes fit. More than one for your comfort: pick one, or pick all !

:-)

lchic - 12:48pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16856 of 16986)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

Showtime Cantabb - POST YOUR MD CONTRIBUTION

klsanford0 - 12:51pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16857 of 16986)

"Now, jump on the bandwagon..."

Yep, that's what WRCooper was trying to do after months of playing an entirely different game. That's what I was telling him; that and his ill-concealed intellectual snobbery based on: exactly Nothing. Or to his mind: based on (what he doesn't understand) is an anti-intellectual argument in the first place. To base one's whole thinking about the multi-layered and complex MD to just one argument....that WRC knows, magically, that any old countermeasure anyone happens to dream up will instantly and totally defeat any known Missile Defense. That's his idea of being an intellectual. One can see that people like WRCooper were always really part of the problem on this Forum; and not a solution to anything.

cantabb - 12:54pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16858 of 16986)

lchic - 12:34pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16851 of 16855)

I've asked you to define pro-American American anti-American

Didn't like one I described for you before:

Anti-American: Most of your posts

Like a fundamentalist Indonesian view of Australia : Anti-Australian enough ? For comparison !

Now how about: Your employment affiliation and your real interest in this thread ?

your failure to clarify suggests you lack the ability to differenciate

You may not have understood it the first time.

Must need "repeating" -- a pet rshpow55 mantra ! His "Loop Test" !

klsanford0 - 12:54pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16859 of 16986)

Cantabb:

Look at it this way...every second, every minute, brings us closer to seeing the end of the utterly ridiculous lchic and her mentally-ill "partner" Showalter....they can strut their insanity and yell and scream all they want, but the end is near...

lchic - 12:55pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16860 of 16986)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

Showtime Cantabb - POST YOUR MD CONTRIBUTION

(126 following messages)

New York Times on the Web Forums Science Missile Defense