New York Times on the Web Forums Science

Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.

lchic - 12:00pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16848 of 16986)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

how tiresome that nihilistic Cantabb, echoing canyon dweller, can be -- lacks the capacity to see the wider perspective and place 'world asset' contributions within the global missile zone

--------

' Morning J

http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.QYGebtFbWso.2337094@.f28e622/18558

lchic - 12:04pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16849 of 16986)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

The bare foot poster

!?! 'Shoes' ... Springtime this away - temps 20-30c ... shoes hibernate

cantabb - 12:10pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16850 of 16986)

lchic - 11:42am Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16844 of 16846)

Spamming this again ?

So exactly 'what is the New York Times' ?

Google | NYT Ethics in journalism ethical journalism

? What should every journalist know

? Why must they keep up to date under changing circumstance

Pages and Pages of it .....

http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.QYGebtFbWso.2337094@.f28e622/18525

NYT Ethics in Journalism_07 - Visit the link for details. http://www.nytco.com/pdf/nyt-code-of-ethics-1-03.pdf [ Google ]

"So exactly," who is lchic ("world asset") ? And who is she (world asset) employed by ? And, "what exactly" is her interest in this thread ?

And "what exactly" are her/rshow's "Ethics" in falsely accusing other posters and in their harassment ?

That is, apart from spreading 'anti-American' gospel, hating NYT (that tolerated her/rshow abuse for so long) and of course, cantabb !

It's 12:11 PM (EST) October 8 -- Do you know where your spams are ?

lchic - 12:34pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16851 of 16986)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

I've asked you to define

pro-American

American

anti-American

your failure to clarify suggests you lack the ability to differenciate

lchic - 12:38pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16852 of 16986)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

spamming

Spamming, in general, is an attempt to feed misleading information to search engines

Cantabb neither searches nor is he an engine!

cantabb - 12:38pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16853 of 16986)

lchic - 12:00pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16848 of 16850)

how tiresome that nihilistic Cantabb, echoing canyon dweller, can be -- lacks the capacity to see the wider perspective and place 'world asset' contributions within the global missile zone

"[T]iresome" and "nihilistic" ? JUST for pointing to your "emperors' new wardrobe ? For asking the Commandant the same questions she has been demanding of other posters --under the threat of further maligning. For pursuing the questions she has been dodging ?

Sure, I lack the "capacity to see the wider perspective" of a never-never-land shrouded in perpetual fog -- or see the value of your faux-Zen "contributions" to anything and everthing BUT Missile Defense !

"[E]choing canyon dweller" ? That would be YOU (for rshow55). And fred"irregardless"moore, who loves to parrot, a good and fast learner from a veld school-yard.

I'm just a lone voice -- sorry, if it echoes so much and so loudly in the depths of your canyons !

How "tiresome" of "nihilstic" of cantabb ?

"Nihilistic" of your/rshow's "TRUTH" and their never-never-land ?

Hope (against hope) this "TRUTH" is let out before Nov 14 : Who employs lchic (Ain't NYT) and her REAL interest in this thread ?

Some "TRUTHS" are afraid to come out !

lchic - 12:04pm Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16849 of 16850)

The bare foot poster !?! 'Shoes' ... Springtime this away - temps 20-30c ... shoes hibernate

Sure, inconvenient and too tight for comfort.

Better to let them "hibernate" -- why let anybody put one on your other foot ?

Your resistance -- quite understandable.

(133 following messages)

New York Times on the Web Forums Science Missile Defense