New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(16724 previous messages)
rshow55
- 04:34am Nov 7, 2003 EST (#
16725 of 16729) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
( continued ) These problems have been major barriers to
progress in international relations and commerce.
The NYT editorial page often asks diplomats to arrange
things that they do not know how to do technically. I think
that if you'd authorize someone at NYT to meet with me - we're
quite close to a situation where general and simple solutions
to this class of problems can be demonstrated and explained so
that they can be solved routinely and practically. With a
model of the kind of solution needed in general worked out -
in the presence of a record that I believe many people and
organizations can and will learn from.
The question is how you produce a "win win" solution under
circumstances where negative sum outcomes are also possible,
and instabilities are a problem. Currently, such circumstances
result in stasis, unnecessary losses, and wars.
I know that this is an unusual request - but the thread
itself is unusual - http://www.mrshowalter.net/Sequential.htm
and represents a large enough investment and enough
complications and potential risks that a sorting out seems in
order - in everybody's interest. The thread embodies the hard
work and hopes of many NYT people. I hope to do everything I
can to make the interaction between me and the TIMES a
positive sum game.
I'm hoping that the Missile Defense thread - after a
meeting and an exchange of short letters, will clearly
demonstrate how to solve the TECHNICAL problems of negotiating
stable outcomes to complex games involving both competition
and cooperation. In a case big enough to study, but not too
big. With real stakes, but not stakes too high to permit
intelligent function of intelligent people.
I believe that the work done on the Missile Defense board,
which has plainly been an expense to The New York Times,
should be a credit to The New York Times, not a source of
problems. An investment of time and good faith worthwhile for
the Times in terms of both status and money for the times.
I'll call your secretary monday morning at 11:00 ET to see
if there is someone I can contact to discuss this. I hope we
can arrange a meeting. I'd be honored to recieve your call to
me at any time at 608 - 829-3657 or you may contact me by
email at this address.
Respectfully,
M. Robert Showalter
M. Robert Showalter
7205 B Old Sauk Rd. Madison, Wi 53717
rshow55
- 04:39am Nov 7, 2003 EST (#
16726 of 16729) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
I did talk to Mr. Sulzberger's secretary 11:00 that monday.
Later in the day, she was kind enough to call me, and say
that Mr. Sulzberger had read the letter - but had not made a
decision. I appreciated the call, and I said so.
- - -
A decision entirely consistent with my request was made,
and I got this email:
FROM: Len Apcar
DATE: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 10:01:37 -0500
TO: mrshowalt@mrshowalter.net
SUBJECT: Missile Defense
Dear Mr. Showalter:
Your letter to our chairman and publisher, Arthur
Sulzberger Jr., about your long participation in the Web
site's forum on missile defense, was forwarded to me. I thank
you for your participation in such a lively and interesting
forum.
Many people come and go from our forums and you are
certainly free to do so. If it feels like a burden to you, I
would certainly understand your decision to move on to other
projects and interests. We write about missile defense issues
regularly and I have advised our reporting staff about your
Web site and your work on missile defense issues in the forum.
Again thank you for your participation on NYTimes.com
Sincerely,
Leonard M. Apcar
Leonard M. Apcar
Editor in Chief
The New York Times on the Web
500 7th Avenue
New York, New York 10018
phone 646 698 xxxx
fax 646 698 xxxx
(3 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|