New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(16594 previous messages)
cantabb
- 08:57pm Nov 5, 2003 EST (#
16595 of 16611)
fredmoore - 08:30pm Nov 5, 2003 EST (# 16593 of
16593)
All it tells me is that you can search and post. Nothing
more.
Filibuster: In legislative practice, the
parliamentary tactic used in the United States Senate by a
minority of the senators—sometimes even a single senator—to
delay or prevent parliamentary action by talking so long
that the majority either grants concessions or withdraws the
bill. .....-the-clock sessions to tire the minority are
measures used to defeat a filibuster. Encyclopaedia
Britannica.
You may search and post-- like your leaders here. BUT do
you understand what you post is an entirely different question
-- still beyond you, as you demonstrate once again. Given my
exchanges with you here and before thos "Science in the News,"
I am not surprised.
it's good enough for the US Senate then
..... it ought to be good enough for
Cantathinkofanythingofhisown.
Filibuster tends to stop the proceeding. NOT here. What any
one posts here does NOT stop anyone else from posting whatever
he/she likes. My criticism of you and your leaders (rshow55
& "World Asset") did NOT prevent any of you from posting,
did it ?
Filibustering can be legitimately defeated
of course, but the intent to defeat ought not eliminate the
recourse to FILIBUSTERING itself. Filibustering remains a
great tradition in US politics and on forums such as this.
Your veld-view ! Ignorance about US shows, just as your
over hostility.
Still hurting in the barnyard, eh ?
cantabb
- 09:08pm Nov 5, 2003 EST (#
16596 of 16611)
"YOUR Ignorance about US shows -- just as your overt
hostility." the penultimate sence in my last post.
fredmoore
- 09:24pm Nov 5, 2003 EST (#
16597 of 16611)
He's lost it .....
Alright!
cantabb
- 10:27pm Nov 5, 2003 EST (#
16598 of 16611)
fredmoore - 09:24pm Nov 5, 2003 EST (# 16597 of
16597)
He's lost it ..... Alright!
And, you never had what it takes !
lchic
- 10:37pm Nov 5, 2003 EST (#
16599 of 16611) ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has
to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong
foundation
As Mrs Worthington's daughter was to stages ...
so too Canttab Jorian and Blue to pages Fredmore
enters stage right ...
he's getting sentimental over Blue ... It ain't over
'til it's over
Whoops there goes another Missle D plant
As one forum closes
ANOTHER ...... opening, another show J - send a team
across to 'Science in the News' to stop the makeover!
bluestar23
- 11:18pm Nov 5, 2003 EST (#
16600 of 16611)
lchic's Guardian poetry:
Blue boy brush stroked
Rain
Rain
Rain
Purple Pink Blue People
rain
bluestar23
- 11:19pm Nov 5, 2003 EST (#
16601 of 16611)
That's what "World Assets" say when they're briefing
President Bush and Putin...
bbbuck
- 11:42pm Nov 5, 2003 EST (#
16602 of 16611)
how about that jennier capriatti's beer gut.
one too many chocolate gut bombs.
I like the blue carpet, though.
(9 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|