New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(16531 previous messages)
cantabb
- 06:06pm Nov 4, 2003 EST (#
16532 of 16548)
jorian319 - 05:40pm Nov 4, 2003 EST (# 16530 of
16531)
That's a great point, cantabb - written
eloquence begins and ends with the writer's precise idea of
the effect he's trying to have upon the reader.
Thanks.
I think Rshow's been 'fishing' without a net or a hook. The
ideas in a "ton of half-baked ideas" are still half-baked --
same applies to 'ten' tons of them (even if unloaded on the
forum a few dozen times)!
bluestar23
- 06:13pm Nov 4, 2003 EST (#
16533 of 16548)
Well, Showalter's typing on "borrowed time" from now
on....his "audience " will disappear....
cantabb
- 06:16pm Nov 4, 2003 EST (#
16534 of 16548)
'twisting slowly in the wind.....' ?
[We've not heard a bleat or anything from the barnyard --
yet. I know it's coming ]
cantabb
- 06:17pm Nov 4, 2003 EST (#
16535 of 16548)
You know he was "hoping for" it...
rshow55
- 07:42pm Nov 4, 2003 EST (#
16536 of 16548) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
re: http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.4dyabSOMVfD.0@.f28e622/18245
- Jorian comments that I'm fishing - and it is a
fact that I'm a little taken aback - I was expecting this
board to be archived this morning - had my mind adjusted to
that. Found that a pleasant prospect. A clean way for me to
move on .
But I did hope that the basic point of http://www.mrshowalter.net/FrequencyOfVeryCommonWords.htm
would interst some people - maybe Jorian most of all.
The standard of "new, surprising and different" is a vital
standard - a news standard. For some other purposes -
and some of the most important purposes - the question "what
happens most frequently?" is an important question.
Jorian uses words superbly - but all the same - the 200
most common words - probably less than .2% of the words he
knows and uses and judges well - are still more than half his
word count.
( I'm guessing - but with a good basis - they are more than
half of practically every good writer's word count. )
Some common things are very important - and
when problems go wrong with monotonous regularity - even for
"obvious" reasons - getting improved understandings can be
worth the trouble.
http://www.mrshowalter.net/FrequencyOfVeryCommonWords.htm
By the way, the facts of http://www.mrshowalter.net/FrequencyOfVeryCommonWords.htm
were the second thing I was taught in crypto training.
Here was the first - and a hard lesson, forcefully
emphasized.
Unvaried stimulus, regardless of amplitude, is
equivalent to NO stimulus.
The most "obvious" things are hard to see. That's a
good reason to point them out.
I'm not sure I'm posting again tonight. When I cited the
data in http://www.mrshowalter.net/FrequencyOfVeryCommonWords.htm
- and the basic lesson about complexity and fallibility in
Nemo's story http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md8000s/md8115.htm
- I was hoping to refer to points that Jorian could
reasonably learn.
Jorian has a low opinion of platitudes - but when
there are basic facts and relations that should be
platitudes - because they are of very wide application - yet
those fact and relations are not widely known - it can be
useful to work those things out.
How many people know how high the frequency of "the
most common things" is - not just in language - but in most
things people do?
http://www.mrshowalter.net/FrequencyOfVeryCommonWords.htm
More should. Maybe from the first grade on.
bluestar23
- 07:57pm Nov 4, 2003 EST (#
16537 of 16548)
Well, you're still babbling Showalter, but NO ONE is
listening.....the Forum is over....you're all ALONE again....
(11 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|