New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(16525 previous messages)
rshow55
- 05:08pm Nov 4, 2003 EST (#
16526 of 16536) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
The most common patterns are the base on which all other
skill patterns are buit - these patterns are MUCH more common
than average - and they are likely to be so automatic that
people don't easily think about them, until they go wrong.
Indeed, these patterns are likely to be "unconscious" as well
as automatic. These most common patterns are especially
important (but in some key ways, especially hard) to get
right. Word frequency is an example.
http://www.mrshowalter.net/FrequencyOfVeryCommonWords.htm
A problem with these most common patterns is that they are
very low in status - even though they are especially
important. Problems at this level are hard to predict, find
and fix - but when problems at this level occur, they are
especially important to find and fix.
- - -
http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md8000s/md8115.htm
contains this
rshowalter - 06:30pm Aug 24, 2001 EST (#8116 of 8127)
MD7178 rshowalter 7/18/01 10:32pm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md7000s/md7176.htm
My old partner, the late Professor Steve Kline, of
Stanford, told me that when he was a grad student at MIT, the
Dean made a point of gathering students together, and telling
them about a story. The story was Jules Verne's TWENTY
THOUSAND LEAGUES UNDER THE SEA .
In Verne's story, a Captain takes 10,000 tons of steel,
glass, wood and other materials
--- he makes careful drawings
-- gets a team of workmen together
-- the team makes the pieces according the
drawings and puts them together . . .
and off the Captain and the workmen go -- cruising 20,000
leagues under the surface of the sea.
The Dean made sure that this lesson was very clearly made
--
" In the whole history of engineering,
NOTHING LIKE THIS HAS EVER HAPPENED."
Things go wrong. Pretty often. For everybody. You have to
test.
No MIT engineer was to leave Cambridge without knowing that
lesson.
- - - -
http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md8000s/md8115.htm
also contains this: frankmz - 05:36pm Aug 24, 2001 EST (#8115
of 8127) As someone who has had experience with complex
computer systems, I have extreme skepticism of a complex
system (and the missile defense system is extremely complex)
that will work in real-time as it was supposed to, and on the
first try.
rshow55
- 05:09pm Nov 4, 2003 EST (#
16527 of 16536) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
These difficulties are more-or-less accepted for new
technical systems. But for the social arrangements of
sociotechnical systems - the point is usually a great
deal less clear. People think they have a deal - in good
faith, as dealmaking goes - and go on to find out that what
they think would work, doesn't. It is easy to find blame,
sometimes for good reasons.
That's especially true in diplomacy - where meetings are
rare and word counts are low.
Because the gains of socio-technical cooperation are so
high http://www.mrshowalter.net/Kline_ExtFactors.htm
complex cooperations that have very positive sums are possible
- but almost all (anyway, the one's I've been able to think
about) are unstable unless there's a good deal of care,
and talking - to put things together.
Getting a new kind of deal working the first time
isn't any more likely than Verne's story. So people have to
take some time. And the people involved ( who are likely to be
preoccupied, emotional, and especially scared) take some time
getting used to anything new and important. Especially if it
deals with very common patterns - obvious as these
patterns may seem.
http://www.mrshowalter.net/FrequencyOfVeryCommonWords.htm
Wish I was more eloquent - but it does seem to me that this
little thread, with the small problems here - is still big
enough to illustrate essentially all the problems that real
complex cooperative negotiations have. Under unstable
circumstances - it can show what it takes for success - and
also how failures happen.
It seems to me that analogies to diplomacy are pretty
direct.
(9 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|