New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (16199 previous messages)

lchic - 03:25pm Nov 2, 2003 EST (# 16200 of 16228)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

I see an achievement bet on the board

Cantabb's saying 'were Showlater permitted to function - he can't'

Showalter's saying ' were he permitted to function - he can'

-----

bluestar23 - 03:27pm Nov 2, 2003 EST (# 16201 of 16228)

lchic: Post on the MD or disappear...

lchic - 03:29pm Nov 2, 2003 EST (# 16202 of 16228)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

'lchic: Get Lost, you little zipperhead.....' says bluestar

Is this comment

pro-american

american

anti-american

or

a demi-platitude from a dude who lacks etiquette?

lchic - 03:33pm Nov 2, 2003 EST (# 16203 of 16228)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

'Zipperhead' - one who's brain has been removed / a complete fool

begs the question -

    how would bluestar over his lifetime
    have become an 'expert' in Zipperheadery?

bluestar23 - 03:34pm Nov 2, 2003 EST (# 16204 of 16228)

Instapundit:

MAUREEN DOWD IS LYING AGAIN: Think that's too strong? Read what Greg Djerejian says -- and follow his links -- and see what you think.

I think that there must be a lot of people who could do a better job on the Times oped page than Maureen Dowd, whose name has already become synonymous with op-ed dishonesty.

According to Dowd: "It's hard to protect yourself from the big lie." Especially, it seems, when it comes via The New York Times.

UPDATE: There's more on Dowd from Cori Dauber, over at The Volokh Conspiracy, who finds Dowd's accusations of "airbrushing" ironic -- at best

More Messages Recent Messages (24 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense