New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (16014 previous messages)

lchic - 11:33pm Oct 30, 2003 EST (# 16015 of 16032)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

Fighting Through

"" Our minds are complex. When dealing with issues, we draw freely on many different attributes, and employ them in varying combinations.

If we give you a series of numbers and asked you to add them up, you'd draw on your arithmetical knowledge. No emotional investment would be needed to solve this problem.

If you turned on the evening news and film footage showed some 12-year old kid shooting up his junior high school with an assault rifle, your response would be emotional.

You'd have plenty of targets for your anger, too.

There's the kid; that's anger target number one.

What about the ease with which these weapons can be acquired?

They're apparently so easily gotten that even a 12-year old can score.

What about the parents? Can't you direct some anger towards them for the abysmally poor job they did of instilling any morality whatsoever into their offspring?

You get the point. Some things are logical. Others grab you by the guts.

http://pokermag.com/managearticle.asp?C=200&A=5615

Let's think about 'America as the Parent' .... and the children? People of the world ...

lchic - 11:39pm Oct 30, 2003 EST (# 16016 of 16032)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

What were the basic common goals of reforms in the region? The

reforms had three central purposes:

  • 1) to increase individual

    freedom and to protect individual and especially human rights

    (democratization process),

  • 2) to introduce free market economy,

  • 3) to settle basis for a higher standard of living for all social

    strata of the society.

    To achieve these goals it was necessary first to abolish the

    previous political system and then to make labor markets more

    effective, including the increase of individual choice, extending

    the role of private and reducing the state sector, to improve and

    adjust education and training to new needs, to cope with

    unemployment and poverty and to promote better health.

    http://www.un.org/popin/confcon/milan/plen2/plen2.html

    bluestar23 - 11:52pm Oct 30, 2003 EST (# 16017 of 16032)

    Now it's worse than just Showalter; it's lchic making all these posts too...double trouble.....

    lchic - 11:57pm Oct 30, 2003 EST (# 16018 of 16032)
    ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

    Simple slogans and sentences may encapsulate an attitudinal response, one country / one culture to another.

    America might best consider why the slogans http://www.forward.com/issues/2003/03.04.11/news1.html emerge, their roots, the reasons why.

    Understanding the grass-roots of discontent ... and working towards an improvement in attitudes is ultimately the better way forward.

    ----

    In his latest book M. Moore points out that only 8% of Americans have 'ever' had a passport! WOW!

    Moore comments that Americans are an 'Ignorant' nation as cp to other passported, travelled peoples.

    His comment not mine.

    ----

    How do Americans change simplex minds to understanding of the complexity of modern society .... and move the ball out of the first world court and into their own?

    ----

    lchic - 11:59pm Oct 30, 2003 EST (# 16019 of 16032)
    ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

    their own - as in Nations that need to upgrade opportunites and workforce to give improved living standards.

    lchic - 12:02am Oct 31, 2003 EST (# 16020 of 16032)
    ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

    Bluestar -- simplex man, Sir, -- why do you use the term 'double trouble' re Showalter and myself ?

    More Messages Recent Messages (12 following messages)

     Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
     Your Preferences

     [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense