New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (15965 previous messages)

rshow55 - 03:46pm Oct 30, 2003 EST (# 15966 of 15983)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Re: attrition.org/priceless

Wars of attrition happen when people have "positions" that, one way or another, they can't or won't ( or dare not ) concede.

15243 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.bc20bm2LTbH.128745@.f28e622/16956 includes this, and some good references to responses to Jorian.

Lchic did a fine post 14115

Stench in the Trench - easy to fall into, hard to get out of

the futility of war

http://www.firstworldwar.com/features/trenchlife.htm

How often do people have to fight? How many people really want to ? How many people, these days, know how to avoid fighting when they don't agree about everything they talk about?

We're fighting, now, because though we're close on a number of things - some "powers that be" seem to be saying " never meet him face to face."

At this stage - the costs to me are small enough, and the gains large enough - and the costs to people like Jorian seem so large - that I don't think things are going so badly, from my side.

Here's an interesting lesson I'm hoping to teach - that could raise my own status and make me some money in the bargain.

If The New York Times can be this petty and stupid - there are some things about negotiation and morality left to be learned.

rshow55 - 03:50pm Oct 30, 2003 EST (# 15967 of 15983)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

It would be an honor indeed to be The Prince of Platitudes - if those platitudes were well organized, widely known, and useful.

After all, for a long time

f = ma

has been "old hat". Useful all the same.

Basic requirements for stable sociotechnical systems might be " platidudinous" - but still well worth setting out, and insisting on.

jorian319 - 03:50pm Oct 30, 2003 EST (# 15968 of 15983)

...costs to people like Jorian seem so large

There may be real costs to "people like" me, but rest assured - I put little-to-no thought into 99% of what I post here. I do invest a bit more in reading some posters' writings... but (with rare exception) not yours.

IOW - no large costs. Not even small costs!

rshow55 - 03:52pm Oct 30, 2003 EST (# 15969 of 15983)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Those things done reflexively can be most important - and most revealing. I'm responsible for what I say and do - and so are you.

jorian319 - 04:05pm Oct 30, 2003 EST (# 15970 of 15983)

Yeah, Robert - that's one of your best comments to date. I take full resposibility for my words and actions, and yet proceed without caution because I'm comfortable with who I am.

Don't have any goblins chasing me, or keeping me down, other than those of my own creation. Neither do you.

rshow55 - 04:14pm Oct 30, 2003 EST (# 15971 of 15983)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Jorian , now just suppose I was able to converse with someone at the NYT - and discuss exactly the issue of "what's keeping me down" - in specific detail - working for a solution to my problem that cost the NYT as little as possible. Maybe I'd find out I didn't have a problem. But for some very straightforward reasons - I think I do. Problems that would be easy for the NYT to solve for me.

The NYT has some problems with me that would be easy to solve by doing so.

Jorian , I'm glad you feel comfortable with who you are. I feel pretty comfortable about my identity, too. Just have a few technical problems to sort out - to keep some promises, and sort out some messes.

More Messages Recent Messages (12 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense