New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (15860 previous messages)

cantabb - 07:18am Oct 29, 2003 EST (# 15861 of 15884)

fredmoore - 06:31am Oct 29, 2003 EST (# 15858 of 15859)

Never coined a word, cantabb? No I don't suppose you could comprehend anything that sophisticated.

You can't even use the words correctly -- forget, 'coining' one.

Unless you think your incorrectly used, misspelled words are 'coining' them ! Makes sense in barnyard ?

The only words you have coined so far as I know is "cantabelle" (just as "sophisticated " as you can do in your schoolyard).

The others, perhaps NOT as "sophisticated," have been:

"Irregardless," "Biggoted," "Hipocracy" and "Chukkle" !

Your rationalizations are not only lame, but also laughable after-thoughts (quite reminiscent of Mme Lafarge/Defarge exchange):

Hipocracy -- attempts at ruling a forum by shooting from the hip.

If you think my comments (carefully documented) were "shooting from the hip," you don't know what you're talking about -- even AFTER such a poor face-saving air-slobbering (not -brushing) of the picture ? Pathetic {look up, you might see a picture you'll recognize)!

Biggotry -- attempting to make oneself biGGer by abusing others and then denying that kind of behaviour is stricly out of the barnyard.

You think it makes sense ? Perhaps in a veld-barnyard.

For a person who has been overtly hostile (with name-calling) right from his VERY first post to me, you are at least being consistent -- still nursing the bruises during our exchanges, without learning a whit !

I think I have summed you up ... there is no more to say. You are clearly a legend ... in your own mind ... and obviously nothing anyone can say will bring you back to reality.

You forgot "chukkle" ! I'm sure you can come up with another equally rational explanation for it too.

So ... nit on and C#ck-a-doodle-do and Off with Rshow's REveramond head! YAWN!

Sleepy time in the veld-barnyard !

cantabb - 07:21am Oct 29, 2003 EST (# 15862 of 15884)

fredmoore - 07:00am Oct 29, 2003 EST (# 15860 of 15861)

http://www.verbatimmag.com/

Preposterous nonsense!

More of the same old slop!

Anything to do with MD here?

  • ****
    I think I'm turning Cantabbese .. I really think so!

    Such power ... what a rush!

    Dream on....

    Schoolyard-barnyard dreams !

    Still hurting, eh ?

    fredmoore - 07:28am Oct 29, 2003 EST (# 15863 of 15884)

    Hipocracy -- attempts at ruling a forum by shooting from the hip.

    Biggotry -- attempting to make oneself biGGer by abusing others and then denying that kind of behaviour is stricly out of the barnyard.

    Maybe if I keep repeating it he'll eventually 'get it'.

    cantabb - 07:40am Oct 29, 2003 EST (# 15864 of 15884)

    fredmoore - 07:28am Oct 29, 2003 EST (# 15863 of 15863)

    Amusing to watch you dig for yourself a deeper hole !

    Hipocracy -- attempts at ruling a forum by shooting from the hip.

    Well documented comments do not qualify !

    Biggotry -- attempting to make oneself biGGer by abusing others and then denying that kind of behaviour is stricly out of the barnyard.

    YOU were the one who started out abusing ME and MY name right from your very first post to me here, and you have NOT apprently grown out of your veld school-yard yet !

    But why let little facts interfere with your lame attempts to get out of the hole you dug for yourself ?

    Maybe if I keep repeating it he'll eventually 'get it'.

    Your leader, rsahow55, has already been trying it (away from the school yard, to his cedit) --- still with NOT much success.

    cantabb - 07:42am Oct 29, 2003 EST (# 15865 of 15884)

    " ... (at least away from the school yard, to his credit) --- still with NOT much success. " in my last post.

    fredmoore - 07:48am Oct 29, 2003 EST (# 15866 of 15884)

    YAWN

    I suppose he can't help it. Sad really.

    More Messages Recent Messages (18 following messages)

     Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
     Your Preferences

     [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense