New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (15775 previous messages)

rshow55 - 08:44am Oct 28, 2003 EST (# 15776 of 15786)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Negotation links from the Missile Defense thread between 5:05 pm and 10:45 pm - October 23, 2003. Set out a simple approach - all I asked was some explanations that NYT knows very well how to give - to things NYT actually knows, or could find out - on a sheet of paper.

15491 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17204">rshow55 10/23/03 5:05pm</a>

15492 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17205">rshow55 10/23/03 5:22pm</a>

15494 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17207">jorian319 10/23/03 5:41pm</a>

15496 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17209">rshow55 10/23/03 5:55pm</a>

15498 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17211">rshow55 10/23/03 5:59pm</a>

15499 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17212">jorian319 10/23/03 6:01pm</a>

15500 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17213">rshow55 10/23/03 6:02pm</a>

15501 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17214">rshow55 10/23/03 6:06pm</a>

15502 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17215">rshow55 10/23/03 6:07pm</a>

15503 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17216">rshow55 10/23/03 6:13pm</a>

15504 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17217">jorian319 10/23/03 6:14pm</a>

15505 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17218">rshow55 10/23/03 6:19pm</a>

15506 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17219">rshow55 10/23/03 6:20pm</a>

15507 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17220">jorian319 10/23/03 6:21pm</a>

15508 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17221">rshow55 10/23/03 6:27pm</a>

15509 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17222">rshow55 10/23/03 6:31pm</a>

15510 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17223">rshow55 10/23/03 6:38pm</a>

15511 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17224">rshow55 10/23/03 6:42pm</a>

15512 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17225">jorian319 10/23/03 7:04pm</a>

15513 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17226">rshow55 10/23/03 7:09pm</a>

15514 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17227">rshow55 10/23/03 7:13pm</a>

15515 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17228">rshow55 10/23/03 7:20pm</a>

15516 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17229">rshow55 10/23/03 7:23pm</a>

15517 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17230">lchic 10/23/03 7:31pm</a>

15518 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17231">lchic 10/23/03 7:34pm</a>

15519 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17232">rshow55 10/23/03 7:36pm</a>

15520 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17233">rshow55 10/23/03 7:40pm</a>

15523 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17236">rshow55 10/23/03 7:49pm</a>

15524 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17237">jorian319 10/23/03 7:51pm</a>

15528 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17241">rshow55 10/23/03 7:54pm</a>

15529 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17242">jorian319 10/23/03 7:54pm</a>

15530 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17243">rshow55 10/23/03 8:01pm</a>

15533 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17246">rshow55 10/23/03 8:04pm</a>

15534 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17247">rshow55 10/23/03 8:07pm</a>

15535 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17248">rshow55 10/23/03 8:13pm</a>

15537 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17250">rshow55 10/23/03 8:16pm</a>

15538 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17251">rshow55 10/23/03 8:18pm</a>

15541 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17254">jorian319 10/23/03 8:38pm</a>

15545 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17258">rshow55 10/23/03 9:04pm</a>

On an issue of precedents: 15548 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.bKWsbjPwSqx.5296027@.f28e622/17261">bluestar23 10/23/03 9:53pm</a>

On

cantabb - 08:50am Oct 28, 2003 EST (# 15777 of 15786)

fredmoore - 08:38am Oct 28, 2003 EST (# 15774 of 15774)

Cantabb, I am intrigued but not obsessed with anything that can stand up so straight for so long when so far removed from any kind of Truth or significant purpose?

"Irregardless," right your very first response to me here (let alone an exchange on 'Science in the News' on your veld-view of freedom of expression in the US), it grew into a full fledged "obsession" before you could say cantabb.

What "Truth" are you talking about ? Something 'generic' that your fellow-travelers lchic and rshow also talking about ? One-"Truth"-fits-ALL ? And, who do you think is standing far apart from "IT" -- and in a Veld schoolyard-barnyard, or in a land of conspiracies ?

You are quite a character .. in a barnyard sort of way.

Fits you better.

Wouldn't know what a veld barnyard looks like, IF you weren't here to 'educate' us about !

More Messages Recent Messages (9 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense